.
Feedback

State Aid Up 31 Percent for Shorewood Schools Due to Assessor's Error

While most school districts across the state cope with flat or declining state education funds, Shorewood will experience a dramatic hike as a result of an assessment error made late last summer.

will see one of the largest state aid percent increases among public school districts in Wisconsin next year — a whopping 31 percent — due to late last summer.

The district will receive an estimated $1,128,518 in additional state aid next year — $4,759,539 compared to $3,631,021 this year — according to state Department of Public Instruction data. That's the third-highest increase statewide, behind Twin Lakes No. 4 and the Stone Bank School Districts.

By comparison, the Whitefish Bay School District expects a 2.16 percent state aid increase and Fox Point-Bayside schools a .83 percent decrease next year.

DPI’s data is only preliminary and actual aid figures will not be known until October after final enrollment and other information is calculated.

It's ironic that the very same  had village officials scrambling to avoid a $2 million artificial increase in their property tax levy. To avoid that spike, , borrowed cash to fund the difference, and then will raise the levy the next year by the same amount.

Where the error came from

occurred when Associated Appraisal Consultants Inc., the village's assessor, recorded the value of Shorewood’s Tax Incremental Financing District No. 1 — which blankets much of the business district — as $77 million instead of $77,000. It then sent that figure to the state Department of Revenue, which then published that incorrect value.

Department of Revenue officials said state law prohibited them from changing the inflated value after it had been published. And as a result, the total equalized value of property in Shorewood was artificially inflated and village property owners could have had to fork over $2 million more on their tax bills.

State education officials use the value of the village, excluding the special taxing district, when calculating aid each district receives. And while the total value of Shorewood is overstated because of the error, the value excluding the special taxing district is actually understated, resulting in the increase of state funds, said District Business Manager Mark Boehlke said.

And this gift will keep on giving. Even when the assessment is corrected, there is a 15 percent cap on state aid decreases in any given year, Boehlke said.

"It will take a few years for the district to even out to where it would otherwise be," he said.

Boehlke said , state officials would likely find a way to fix the funding glitch, but when contacted after the funding estimates were released, the state said it would go with the current numbers.

How to use the extra cash

The increase in state aid typically means a decrease in the tax levy and the district's portion of resident's property tax bill, but Boehlke said the district is talking with its financial advisors about using some of the extra cash for a energy conservation project in the district.

The Shorewood School Board has yet to approve a 2012-13 preliminary budget. The board that allowed the district to move forward with hiring of new staff. School officials recently hired .

Shorewood expects to save nearly $475,000 in this budget cycle due to the , while it is still vetting additions like a at a cost of $75,000, and a computer technician at $70,000.

The DPI estimates are derived from two areas: the and the relevant school district data from the 2011-12 school year. These include membership, shared costs and property value, according to a press release from the DPI.

James R Hoffa August 2, 2012 at 05:06 am
Awarding a mistake with taxpayer dollars instead of holding those who made the mistake personally accountable for their blunders.
WTF?
Bob McBride August 2, 2012 at 10:32 am
Actually it all comes out in the wash - sort of. They're not really being rewarded. They screwed up last year, didn't get the proper amount they should have from the state due to grossly overstating the value of commercial properties in the Village. They had to borrow money to cover the shortfall (rather than hit up local property owners for the $2MM in one year) and this rights the ship from the state funding standpoint. They're still on the hook for the $2MM plus interest. This was anticipated last year when they were panicking over the shortfall.
Granted, the folks that screwed up were let off the hook with the equivalent of "hey, mistakes happen" (best I can tell anyways), but then again "hey, it's the government".
Bob McBride August 2, 2012 at 10:54 am
I stand corrected. Yes, it looks like they're being rewarded, essentially, for screwing up, thanks to the limitation on annual decreases in State aid. And, of course, instead of cutting property taxes and kicking the money back to SOME taxpayers at least, they're going to spend it.
Shorelander August 2, 2012 at 12:39 pm
Hey, Shorewood, way to work the system.
Could we get our money back? Signed, Every other school district in Wisconsin
The Donny Show August 2, 2012 at 05:52 pm
Shorewood should not take the money. It is not due to them. Be honest!
Adam W. McCoy (Editor) August 2, 2012 at 07:44 pm
The district didn't work the system. The error was made by the village's assessor, and it just happened to work out in the district's favor in terms of state aid.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.
FailBoat
Nuitari June 3, 2013 at 08:37 pm
These posts are certainly more enlightening than Lyle Ruble's junk.
Steve ® June 3, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Racist
Steve ® June 2, 2013 at 11:38 pm
The main stream media says yes. So it's true.