.
Feedback

A New Miss Shorewood Is Crowned

Dressed in ball gowns and heels, male Shorewood High School students strutted their stuff on the stage Friday, raising $2,700 for the MACC Fund.

Dressed in ball gowns and heels, male Shorewood High School students strutted their stuff on the stage Friday, raising $2,700 for the MACC Fund.

This year, the pageant, organized each year by the student council, is apart of the Shorewood Games — a two-week fundraising campaign to benefit the MACC Fund (Midwest Athletes Against Childhood Cancer). 

Every four years since the 1980s, the community has united for the games, and over the decades, raised $135,000 for the MACC Fund. Hopes are to bring the total to more than $150,000 this year.

Last year, the pageant proceeds benefited the Wisconsin chapter of Greyhound Pets of America, which helps ex-racing greyhounds find adoptive homes.

The pageant included an introduction of the Miss Shorewood contestants, a question and answer segment and a talent show. The audience then bid on the Miss Shorewood contestants, with the bid money going to the MACC Fund. 

Miss Roberta Kohl, also known as Bobby Kohl, was crowned Miss Shorewood this year.

Margaret Schmidt March 12, 2013 at 12:54 pm
I guess they missed the public showing of "Miss Representation" last spring. Sexism is alive and well at SHS!
Joe Peterlin March 12, 2013 at 02:57 pm
Agree. This is wrong on so many levels; no matter how much money it raises.
The Donny Show March 12, 2013 at 04:44 pm
They should allow weed sales in designated spots with 15% of sales going to the MACC fund. Bet that would raise 10K easy.
VLC March 12, 2013 at 08:56 pm
If this was meant to mock and expose "real" beauty pageants for the sexist junk they are, it missed its mark. I'd suggest SHS nix this in the future.
Mary Maruszewski March 12, 2013 at 09:41 pm
Aw c'mon - I thought it was fun! I give those young men credit. I don't see it as sexist. Less pay for equal work, under-representation in executive positions ... sexism is alive and well but not this.
Taylor Anapol March 14, 2013 at 01:41 am
This isn't sexist. Both the principal and vice principal of this school have a great deal of integrity, and would never let us, as a student body, do anything that could be offensive. This program helped raise hundreds of dollars for the MACC fund, and the boys who took part in it were all very proud to have been a part of it. Everyone who attended Miss Shorewood was impressed by the bravery of the young men who took part in it, and everyone at Shorewood is very proud of our accomplishment. This event always makes a big contribution to our charity of the year, and should in no way be removed from our lineup of amazing fundraising events.
Amara Aguilera March 14, 2013 at 02:02 am
I agree with the comment above, in this case we should not be focused on if or how this is sexiest but the main idea of why they did it in the first place to raise money for the macc fund. Which if you don't know what it is you should look it up it is a great cause! It is a classic to do, and gets students involved. On the other hand maybe how they act was "sexiest" but it was merely to get a laugh out of the crowd. If it was sexiest truly guys wouldn't dress up like women i believe. Because in reality men that dress up upon women are frowned upon in society. But during this event, that rule is broken, i feel it is refreshing, and nobody says any harsh words that they are. Who would its for a great cause. In some cases like this, women shouldn't take it to heart. Childhood cancer feels more important then wondering if this is "sexiest".
VLC March 14, 2013 at 11:58 am
Whenever I wonder if something is inappropriate, and why or why not, I ask myself "what would it look like if it was the other way around?" That is, for this one for example, what would it look like if female students dressed up like men and parodied a male body-building event? Would it be funny? If not, why not? If so, why so? Would we be calling the women "brave" for dressing up as men? The answers to those questions should shed light on whether this hit its mark.
CowDung March 14, 2013 at 01:43 pm
I'm fairly sure that the administration would let the student body do things that could be offensive--the crosses on the football helmets were deemed to be offensive, and the production of Godspell could be seen along those same lines.
Pretty much anything that can be done can be found to be offensive to somebody or other...
Mike March 14, 2013 at 02:34 pm
Wow, lighten up people. Some kids had some fun while raising money for a good cause. No one was hurt, some people enjoyed themselves, and a great charity got almost $3,000, what's the problem? Go focus your negative energy on a real issue, or I should say, a real aspect of the issue you're trying to drag this into.
Joe Long March 14, 2013 at 09:19 pm
I truly don't think that these kids were trying to be disrespectful to women when they signed up for Miss Shorewood. I am actually shocked at this communities reaction to an even that raised around $3,000 for a charity fighting childhood cancer.
Margaret Schmidt March 18, 2013 at 12:20 am
This is blatant sexism whether you want to see it or not. There was a time when black face was considered socially acceptable entertainment, too, but that doesn't change the fact that it was racist, and I'm quite sure the principal and assistant principal would never condone this. I applaud the students for working together for a cause, and I'm quite sure that the creative and thoughtful student council members will work hard to find a better way to fight injustice, whether it be cancer, racism, sexism, hunger, illiteracy, or any other good cause they take on.
Mike March 18, 2013 at 01:07 pm
Lighten up, with all that's wrong in the World today, some high school kids acting silly and having fun for a good cause is hardly anything to get up in arms about. Our World either overreacts to things, or completely ignores them, seems like there's no middle ground anymore. Focus your negative energy on something that deserves it.
CowDung March 18, 2013 at 01:30 pm
Where should one draw the line, Mike?
When I was in high school, we had 'slave' auctions as a fundraiser event. Not sure why it took so many years for school administration to figure out why none of the Black kids ever signed up for it. What measure should be used to determine if some of these 'silly' activities cross the line?
Mike March 18, 2013 at 01:54 pm
Cow, I remember having those in grade school as well, and of course, looking back on it, that certainly does cross a line. However, I don't think this compares to that in any way, shape, or form. This was innocent, it wasn't aimed specifically at anyone, it raised money for a good cause. I go back to my original point, with all the sh*t in the World, why would anyone focus negative energy on something like this? Thing is, anyone can find anything offensive for any reason, it's purely subjective, there's nothing here you can objectively point to that says this is out of bounds.
Bob McBride March 18, 2013 at 02:05 pm
This definitely falls under the category of "first world problems".
Margaret Schmidt March 19, 2013 at 01:15 pm
Gender stereotyping is harmful to males as well as females. This is a whole world problem. You're either part of the solution or part of the problem.
Mike March 19, 2013 at 01:41 pm
Or I'm just a normal person who doesn't take silly things, like this event, too seriously, a person who can still laugh at things that are meant to be funny without being offended for the sake of being offended.
Tell me, specifically, based on the article, videos, and photos, what is so problematic about this? I want genuine specifics. Tell me who was hurt, how they were hurt, and what the consequences are.
Margaret Schmidt March 19, 2013 at 05:46 pm
I would say that simulating a strip tease act, and raising one's skirt to encourage the audience to bid higher are clearly acts that reinforce negative stereotypes of women as sexual objects. The objectification of females is as harmful to males as it is to females. This is not the kind of behavior we want to encourage anywhere, and certainly not in a school endorsed event. This is not about a silly event, but rather inappropriate conduct. As a survivor of sexual assault, I don't find this silly or laughable, and I stand up for what I believe. Sorry if you're uncomfortable with this, "Mike". If you haven't yet seen "Miss Representation", I encourage you to view it and consider how deeply engrained sexual stereotypes are in our culture.
The Donny Show March 19, 2013 at 06:00 pm
Relax Dess. Just because you were raped doesnt mean that everything that has to do with woman and gender should be offensive.
Bob McBride March 19, 2013 at 06:21 pm
I'd hazard a guess that it's virtually impossible for anyone not to be part of some problem for you.
I'm also relatively confident that it would be virtually impossible for any student in Shorewood's school system not to be exposed to more than double a lifetime's required allotment of PC-think and sensitivity training. This was for a good cause and no one got hurt. Give it a rest, already.
Mike March 19, 2013 at 07:47 pm
Why am I "Mike", if I were using an alias I'd come up with something more creative. I'm not going to waste my time watching whatever "Miss Representation" is. I'm truly sorry you went through a terrible situation, no one should ever have to do that. And I'm not against anyone standing up for what they believe in, but I still think this was harmless fun for a good cause. Until some harm comes from this event, I'll feel that way.
Jim Genthe March 21, 2013 at 03:17 pm
Well, I'm glad you cleared *that* up for us! (whew)
Jean Valjean May 3, 2013 at 02:52 pm
Margaret Schmidt,
This whole Miss Representation is all a bit of fun for the students at Shorewood HighSchool. Let it go. The point was to raise money for cancer research. -24601
Andy Ballsham May 12, 2013 at 04:53 am
Come prisoner 24601! Your time is up and your parole's begun! YOU know what that means!!!
FRENCH FOREVER! #suckstosuck

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.