.
Feedback

Tom Barrett Aggressively Goes After Scott Walker in First Debate

The two candidates in the June 5 gubernatorial recall election went head to head on Friday night, with Barrett launching numerous attacks against Republican Gov. Scott Walker.

There's no question that Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett, who is trailing in the most recent polls, came out swinging against Gov. Scott Walker in a televised debate Friday night.

But whether he landed enough punches to sway enough voters in the June 5 recall election remains to be seen.

During the debate, sponsored by the Wisconsin Broadcasters Association, Democrat Barrett went after the Republican governor on a variety of issues, The Huffington Post reported.

According to a story by Amanda Terkel:

Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett  aggressively went after Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker  in the first of two gubernatorial debates, taking him to task for an ongoing corruption probe, repeal of an equal pay enforcement law and out-of-state fundraising. Walker largely stuck to his talking points, spending more time going after unions than directly attacking Barrett, and telling viewers that the way to heal the polarized state was to re-elect him on June 5 and move beyond the recalls.

"This is not a rematch or a do-over," said Barrett, referring to his unsuccessful race against Walker in the 2010 gubernatorial election. "We cannot do-over the decision of Scott Walker to start a political civil war, which resulted in this state losing more jobs than any other state in the entire country in 2011.

Walker — who holds — fired a few shots of his own as well, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Walker noted that unemployment and taxes went up during Barrett's time as mayor.

According to the Journal Sentinel:

Walker said Barrett hasn't said enough about what tough choices he would have made to balance the state budget and what choices he would make going forward in the next budget.

"We don't really know what Barrett's going to do," Walker said. "He hasn't told the voters. He doesn't have a plan."

After the debate, both the Walker and Barrett campaigns wasted no time in declaring their candidate the winner.

"Tom Barrett won the first general election debate against Scott Walker in overwhelming fashion by focusing the discussion on critical issues of jobs, honesty, trust and the people of Wisconsin," the Barrett campaign said in a statement Friday night. "The debate drew a strong distinction between their approaches to leadership."

In a press release sent out less than five minutes after the debate ended, the Walker campaign said:

Governor Scott Walker delivered an exceptional debate performance this evening, handily defeating Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett in the first of two televised debates ahead of the June 5 recall election.

“Governor Walker showed Wisconsin voters tonight why he is the best choice to move Wisconsin forward,” said Walker campaign spokeswoman Ciara Matthews. “Governor Walker’s reforms transformed a $3.6 billion budget deficit into a $154 million surplus, saved taxpayers over $1 billion, and helped Wisconsin employers create over 35,000 jobs. Mayor Barrett knows the truth is on our side, which is why he is resorting to angry and desperate tactics to distract voters and hide from his failed record as Milwaukee’s mayor.”

Both sides also sent reporters a myriad of "Fact Check" press releases throughout the debate in which they pointed our "misstatements" made by the opposing candidate. The state Republican Party emailed the media at least 10 such press releases during the one-hour debate.

Rich Petersen May 28, 2012 at 08:25 pm
Justme: Your (exaggerated) paraphrasing about NEA's motives is (greatly) misleading. The statement by Bob Chanin was his own personal opinion. He actually said "... it is not because we care about children, ..." and "NEA and it's affiliates are effective advocates because we have power". The meaning is quite different from your (biased) spin.
Randy1949 May 28, 2012 at 08:29 pm
Hoffa, there was a time I would vote my conscience and waste it on a third party candidate or even a write-in. But no longer. The GOP has become just too extreme and now it's gotten serious.
I'm not for layoffs, I'm not for deficits. But I'm most certainly not for measures designed to rob the other side of political funding now and from now on and pretending it's about the budget. All Walker and the Fitzes had to do was write a sunset into Act 10 to reinstate full collective bargaining once economic growth reached a certain percentage again. Unions didn't cause this mess -- it's the economy, with layoffs that mean less income tax and sales tax revenues. Divide and conquer is a recipe for push-back.
James R Hoffa May 28, 2012 at 08:43 pm
@Randy1949 -
The Democrats are using the same divide and conquer strategy by targeting the wealthy as being the bad guys. We on the right see the left going to the extreme when states like IL raise taxes across the board by 66% or even higher, and then still don't have enough revenue to cover their expenditures. Did you hear about the Chicago teacher's union rejecting a 2% pay increase in recent contract negotiations? Unions are nothing more than people, just as corporations are nothing more than people. Even if the union or corporation ceases to exist, the people that made up those entities still exist are just as capable of contributing to political parties as their former collective entities were. The whole taking away a funding source argument is nothing but a giant red herring argument.
Mike in OC May 28, 2012 at 08:44 pm
@Bren..... are you practicing for your first Toastmasters presentation? you keep repeating and repeating and repeating yourself. I think you have said the same stuff so much that you actually believe your lies.
Mike in OC May 28, 2012 at 08:47 pm
@hoffa..... be careful using the world "surplus" around democrats.... it scares them as much as spending cuts.
Randy1949 May 28, 2012 at 08:49 pm
@JRH -- Really? Explain to me why Diane Hendricks wants a 'right to work' state. She runs a non-union business already, one that doesn't pay corporate income taxes between 2005 and 2008 (and perhaps more recently, since those figures aren't yet available). What more in the way of profit does she think she'll get?
Rich Petersen May 28, 2012 at 09:02 pm
Yet another Republican makes a argument against Walker - http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/conscience-realist/2012/may/17/republican-case-against-scott-walkers-reelection/
The Republican party would be better off without his ilk.
James R Hoffa May 28, 2012 at 09:08 pm
@Randy1949 -
I can't intelligently speak on behalf of another's motivations no more than you can. What I can tell you is that right to work legislation does not prevent private sector unions from forming. In fact, private sector unions in right to work states tend to have a more involved membership that carefully selects decent leadership which tends to follow James Riddle Hoffa's model of treating union/management relations as a symbiotic arrangement as opposed to one based on conflicting ideologies. In general, unions in right-to-work states tend to be foundationally stronger than their counterparts in closed shop states, which let's face the reality of the situation, have just become outright complacent, lazy, and unrealistic in their demands/expectations.
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 12:02 am
@Bren-Actually I am rolling on the floor laughing my ass off or ROFLMMFAO!!! At your continuous repatition. It seems you just keep repeating yourself but switching it up a little or should say putting that true liberal spin. As u can see by all the poles and the latest poll showing Walker up by 8. See the fiscally responsible citizen, the very citizen that put Walker in office is very very pleased with his performance thus far. It takes big BALLS to do what Gov Walker has done and continues to do
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 12:07 am
@Bren-Well its obvious why the endorsed walker. They want a real leader not a failure like Barrett. Its Flynn who wants to make Barrett look good cause they are one in the same. Flynn is a clown as much as Barrett!! Sherriff Clark is a leader just Gov Walker. So while ur down there Bren I would appreciate it:))
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 12:11 am
@Rich-Ya well a socialist media blog? Give me a break. See the difference is were conservatives, fiscally responsible conservatives. There are many left leaning republicans who well really are not republicans. Just as many of your side claim to be democratic, well couldnt be farther from the truth. Rather hard core left leaning progressives, socialists, marxists or what ever u call urself
Cricket May 29, 2012 at 01:17 am
Bren - do you realize what you said - "Remember that he is not actually in office yet--no candidate can have the full picture of the situation until they are seated" But of course that doesn't pertain to Walker does it - only for Democrats huh?
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 02:21 am
@Bren-Why is always the other guys fault when it comes to the left. There is never any self responsibility for anything with you liberals. Makes it easier when u can blame the other guy. Such a twisted ideology!! Maybe thats how you can justify your actions or lack of over and over.
Similar to the description of insanity- Repeating the same mistakes over and over expecting different results!! June 5th Wisconsin moves forward with Gov Walker!!! Whoooooooo Hooooooooo We have assumed control!! We have assemed control!! We have assumed control!!
Bren May 29, 2012 at 02:25 am
Mr. Hoffa, bottom line, here's what happened: people who voted for Walker wanted change from Doyle's way of doing business. Doyle's debt restructuring shot up because of the Great Recession.
Walker, it turns out, also restructured debt--no change from Doyle there. What is different is that he has increased state debt more than Doyle did, and wasn't forthright about it. He claimed to have a surplus. This is much, much worse than axing state programs and jobs to "balance the budget." Increasing state debt is not synonymous with "It's working." More Walker budget shenanigans, on top of ALEC and the rest of it. I'm guessing this is really going to upset a lot of people. Mr. Hoffa, bloviate about "hypocrisy" being "DPW" all you wish. The true hypocrisy lies with our Governor.
Bren May 29, 2012 at 02:28 am
Mike in OC, whatever complaints people had about Doyle restructuring debt, which caused them to vote for Walker, will now know that what Walker has done in this area is far more extensive--and expensive than what Doyle did.
Walker restructured debt and increased interest expense, and raised taxes on low income seniors by butchering Homestead tax credits. Tax and spend "conservatives." GOP, fix your party! Recall Scott Walker!
Bren May 29, 2012 at 02:31 am
Patriot, which poll has Walker up by 8 points? You forgot your link.
Mike in OC, all I do is read the newspapers and watch the news. The information is there for all. Anyone take you up on your "Second Amendment Solution" invitation to your home yet? ; )
James R Hoffa May 29, 2012 at 02:43 am
@Bren -
Obviously, you missed the bottom line. The last three previous Governors, and especially Doyle, issued new original debt on top of refinancing old debt. Walker is merely refinancing old debt. Nowhere can I find anything in any of morninmist's links or online about new original state debt being issued under Walker - it's all just refinancing. That's the difference - and it's a HUGE one! Also, Doyle promised that he wouldn't approve a budget raising taxes while campaigning, but then did that very thing, remember? That on top of raiding funds, leaving outstanding liability with the state of Minnesota, and receiving and spending the largest federal stimulus in our state's history - and it still wasn't enough to get to a GAAP balanced budget. That's why people were finally fed up and wanted change. By not issuing any new original state debt, Walker is being true to the spirit of his promises regarding the budget. And the only reason he's refinancing previously issued debt is out of compromise to avoid deeper cuts from the state budget and mass layoffs of state public workers. But, if you really prefer that he get to a GAAP balanced budget, while also maintaining his promise on holding the line on taxes, then why aren't you calling for deeper cuts and mass layoffs?
James R Hoffa May 29, 2012 at 02:44 am
Your positions regarding Walker are confusing - you say there's no balance, and yet when he compromises to please those on your side, you attack him for doing that! You've made it abundantly clear that no matter what Walker does, you will not be pleased with it simply because he's Walker.
James R Hoffa May 29, 2012 at 02:57 am
@morninmist -
"Governors delayed debt payments in the past. During the economic downturn Governor Doyle’s administration postponed debt to maintain state operations. But even during the recession, he did not delay debt payments at the speed or size Governor Walker delayed in the past year" That's because Governor Doyle didn't have the debt load to deal with that Walker now does because Doyle created a majority of it through new original debt offerings during his administration - duh!!! You really couldn't figure that one out on your own?!?! Unlike your precious Doyle, Governor Walker hasn't issued any new original debt obligations thus far - it's all just refinancing what previously existed. And the only reason he's doing that is out of compromise to prevent having to make deeper cuts to the budget or mass layoffs to public employees, which I'm sure would just act to enrage your side even further if he did, so I don't know why all of sudden your side is now attacking him for doing what he's doing - care to explain??? Man, for a guy that loves to post links to crap, you can't even read the full Politifact investigations, cause if you had, you would have realized all of this and avoided making yourself look a fool here. Then again, we don't expect very much from the koolaide drinking crowd that is unable to think for themselves, so carry on! Once again proving that Democrats prey upon the low information, non-thinking voter.
datadawg May 29, 2012 at 04:49 am
Walker got beat up pretty good at that debate.
Bren May 29, 2012 at 05:06 am
Mr. Hoffa, Nothing I have written is contradictory. I think the issue is that you have been away awhile and need to catch up. Thanks to morninmist we all have the answer to that nagging question, how did Walker go from "we balanced the budget" to a projected GAAP deficit, then a $153 million surplus? By using the same tactics Doyle and other governors have done, but in a far more egregious way.
Thank you Mayor Barrett for bringing the truth to the people of Wisconsin during the debate. Thank you morninmist for conducting and presenting the research. Recall Scott Walker.
Rich Petersen May 29, 2012 at 05:33 am
I try not to label people because the reality is that their political beliefs vary across the political spectrum depending upon the issue. Labeling and/or name calling is a gross generalization and oversimplification that just polarizes folks even further. Just what Walker wants. Divide and conquer common folk to quibble over crumbs while this country's wealth and power further shifts toward the now less than 1%.
Here are a liberal's two open letters to his conservative friends and family. Without name calling he describes his well thought out rational for opposing Walker and his agenda. Decide for yourself. It is worth reading with an open mind. http://baronvonreed.com/category/baronish-musings/on-politics/
datadawg May 29, 2012 at 05:44 am
Walker punished voters for belonging to unions for political gain. He should be in prison.
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 09:28 am
Please explain how voters were punished?
Patriot May 29, 2012 at 09:32 am
@Bren-Tax and spend? Really? Are you so far out of touch with what your party has done? The Obama Admin is #1 for tax and spend!!!
morninmist May 29, 2012 at 11:37 am
He is hiding this week or surrounding himself with supporters.
@Progress2day Fearful Walker keeping low profile, trying to run out the clock. Afraid of the people http://politi.co/KY0h0O #recallwalker
morninmist May 29, 2012 at 11:50 am
Enjoy:-)
Ashland Current ‏@ashlandcurrent Editorial cartoon: supporting Walker: http://www.ashlandcurrent.com/image/12/05/29/editorial-cartoon-supporting-walker
Patriot May 30, 2012 at 09:24 pm
Under Barrett this is our future!!! Also check out Ohio, fixing to cut lots of public sector jobs!! Vote for Gov Walker June 5th or face a crisis.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/upshot/illinois-state-lawmaker-meltdown-house-floor-let-people-194225738.html
Justme May 31, 2012 at 11:07 am
Rich: The over-the-top standing ovation Bob Chanin received after he said those words about the power of the union and money (FORCED dues) speaks for itself. It obviously wasn't his own opinion - it appears he was speaking for everyone in that huge audience who stood and cheered. Glad to hear that many WI public sector employees are wising up and NOT paying dues now that Walker gave them the FREEDOM to choose what to do with their OWN money.
Rich Petersen May 31, 2012 at 05:31 pm
Justme: Yes the crowd agreed but that misses the point. The point is that your paraphrasing was an intentional twisting of words into a false meaning. Your statement that he said "it's not about the kids, it's all about the power and money." means something entirely different from what he was saying. His point was that having creative ideas, caring about children, and having a vision of a great public school for every child, which they do, are not why the NEA and affiliates are effective advocates. They are effective because of the power they have from membership.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.
FailBoat
Nuitari June 3, 2013 at 08:37 pm
These posts are certainly more enlightening than Lyle Ruble's junk.
Steve ® June 3, 2013 at 11:00 pm
Racist
Steve ® June 2, 2013 at 11:38 pm
The main stream media says yes. So it's true.