.
Feedback

The Money Game: Spending Exceeds $60 Million in Governor Recall Race

Republican Gov. Scott Walker has spent more than Democrat Tom Barrett and special-interest groups combined as he tries to keep the state's top office.

Money is flowing into Wisconsin at unprecedented rates, with nearly $62 million spent thus far in the gubernatorial recall race, a nonpartisan campaign finance watchdog group reported Thursday.

Republican Gov. Scott Walker has spent more than Democratic opponent Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett and special-interest groups combined, with $29.3 million of his $30.5 million war chest spent thus far. Barrett won a May 8 primary election, setting the stage for a Tuesday.

The new numbers released by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign show total spending is nearly double the record for a statewide race of $37.4 million set during the 2010 gubernatorial race - also between Walker and Barrett.

Of the $29 million, Walker has spent $5.8 million, including $4.8 million from individual donors and just more than $300,000 from political action committees, since April 24. Of Walker’s itemized individual contributions, 70 percent came from outside the state, the group says.

See who is donating to Walker and Barrett with

Meanwhile, Democratic candidates have spent roughly $4 million, with Barrett accounting for $2.9 million of the total. Barrett has raised $3.1 million from April 24 to May 21 — $3.94 since entering the race in March — including nearly $2.6 million from individuals and $508,000 from political action committees.

Of his itemized contributions in this latest reporting period, 30 percent came from outside Wisconsin. He has collected about $3.4 million from individuals, with 74 percent coming from Wisconsin residents and 26 percent from out of state.

Outside interest groups reported spending $21.5 million on the race and so-called issue ad groups that do not disclose their spending have dumped at least another $7.5 million into the election.

Wisconsin Democracy Campaign says overall spending has been lopsided in favor of the Republicans, with somewhere between a 2-to-1 and 3-to-1 edge.

Craig May 31, 2012 at 03:47 pm
I do not care how much money is spent by either candidate- that is donated money. What I do care about is how much the election is going to cost me!
$20 Million and what do we get? The same two candidates we had a year ago. Then we will have added costs of a recount and possible court battles. Union money will be used to contest the vote, but the taxpayer will be screwed again.
Steve ® May 31, 2012 at 04:11 pm
Seems like the rich really do make the world go round with their spending. *cough* Victor Drover *cough*
Charge the cost of the recall to WEAC, WEA Trust, and the WI democrat party. What an absolute waste of my hard earned revenue.
Alfred May 31, 2012 at 04:21 pm
This is what Democracy looks like!
James R Hoffa May 31, 2012 at 05:03 pm
What these numbers fail to realize is all the money that has been spent by the recall crowd since February of last year in mounting this campaign against Walker. The offices, the paper, the lawyers, the busses, the regalia, the websites, the permit fees, the advertisements, the mailers, ... the list is quite frankly endless! After all, none of that stuff is free and it all went to building and waging a campaign against the Walker administration and it's policies, even when the opposition didn't have a candidate yet!
So, when you add in all of those funds, things are actually more equal than these reports show them to be, if not the opposition having actually outspent the Walker campaign. Please, let's be real and honest and about the money situation, shall we?
Mike June 2, 2012 at 03:30 pm
Spending $60M in the recall is GREAT for WI. Look at all the outside money coming into our great state and being spent. Printing companies, TV stations, News papers being sold and the list goes on. The only thing that could make it better is if Walker brings even more outside money into our state, before he leaves office that is.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nuitari June 19, 2013 at 03:45 pm
I hate this.
Bob McBride June 19, 2013 at 03:52 pm
Can you stop hating it for an hour?
Greg June 19, 2013 at 07:22 pm
I blame the internet for bigotry towards globes.
Greg June 14, 2013 at 08:56 pm
Ankeny NewPatch rocks!
Vicki Bennett June 19, 2013 at 04:19 pm
This makes absolutely no sense to the normal reader. What the heck are your talking about??
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.