.
Feedback

Expect to Pay More on Your Sewer Bill Soon

Shorewood officials say they need a sewer rate hike to pay debt for sewer improvements.

A sewer tax rate increase is on the horizon for Shorewood residents as the village works to pay for debt from sewer repairs. 

The Village Board discussed three possible options Tuesday night to pay for debt related to sewer improvements conducted in the northwestern portion of the village, on North Downer Avenue and sewer maintenance. 

Without a rate increase, the village's sewer utility fund would face a cash deficit by the end of the year. If the village wants to borrow for future sewer projects, the sewer rate must bring in enough money to keep a cash balance of 33 percent of operating expenses and an operating income at 125 percent of the debt service for the previous year. 

Village staff presented three options:

  • A rate increase of 46 percent in 2013, translating into an averaged quarterly $39 increase, an annual increase of $157.
  • A rate increase of 33 percent in 2013 ($28 quarterly increase, $113 annually), followed by an increase of 9 percent in 2015 ($10 quarterly increase, $41 annually). 
  • A rate increase of 26 percent in 2013 (averaged $22 quarterly increase, $89 annually) and 12 percent increase in 2014 (averaged $12 quarterly increase and 51 annually). 

The first option, with one large increase would cover the cash balance as well as the operating income this year. The second option would cover the cash balance this year and bring the operating income by 2014. The final option would cover cash balance and operating income in 2014.

Within all of the options, a rate increase would be effective beginning Feb. 15, meaning the increase will show up on bills received in June. Sewer tax bills are dispersed on a quarterly basis and are separate from the property tax bill calculated at the end of the year.

Officials leaned toward the second option, but asked village staff to bring back a recommendation on Feb. 5, when the Village Board is expected to make a final decision.

Additional rate increases could be possible in 2016 if the village decides to move forward with other sewer projects. 

The work is part of a $32.4 million comprehensive approach to revamp Shorewood's outdated sewer system, which couldn't handle torrential rains in July 2010.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Students First January 27, 2013 at 05:25 am
Get use to it Shorewood. The Village Board didn't do it's job over the years and kept "HOPE"ing the bill would never arrive because they didn't put enough money into reserves for capital expenditures.
I guess the $100s of thousands of dollars the Village Board and Manager have spent over the years for 30 year plans, mission statements, and consulting reports couldn't prevent this. This is exactly what Shorewood deserves, because the voters and Village board are more concerned about adding excessive Village staff (just look at the number of employees in Code enforcement and inspections) higher Village salaries, pensions, and health benefits instead of doing what is prudent. They were more concerned with kicking good businesses out of the Village for wanting to place a sign on the sidewalk while at the same time the Village looks the other way as the High School has a 6'x6'x4 composting bin 25 feet from the sidewalk on Oakland Ave. (btw-the compost bin was moved there last spring after the overpaid custodial staff discovered its original location was the source of a foul smell in the Auditorium building, which they had spent Tens of $1,000s of dollars trying to find the source of the foul smell only to discover it was the compost bin they placed in front of the HVAC's fresh air intake) Get ready Shorewood because you haven't seen anything yet. Wait until the School Board tells you what they've been doing with their required reserves for capital expenses.
EmpthyCursed January 27, 2013 at 01:29 pm
Custodial staff is NOT over paid. The do a lot of work in each building. If you have seen the amount of trash, small "expressions of art", and other things that students could have prevented that. the custodial is responsible for you would understand why they are paid that way. Some proper home training of a select few students may make part of their jobs simpler in turn letting them actually do the work they were trained for.
I would MUCH rather pay higher taxes to the school system. If you don't want to contribute to the future residents of shorewood and you don't have any children in the system, you need not complain, sell your house to a family that wants to be here at any cost. Maybe what we need to do is look at the companies we are hiring for these projects are THEY paid too much? How many times have we paid extra for projects because they exceed the expected time limit. I've seen workers standing around smoking, talking, watching the clock. Maybe we need to out source better. Why not hire shorewood residents on unemployment who may have the skills to get things done around here. These workers would take pride in the village that they live in. Just saying.
Students First February 12, 2013 at 05:47 am
Yes, how about the money spent on trying to find the source of the foul smell in the auditorium building? It was caused by placing the compost bin next to the fresh air intake.
Work is work empthy! Trash and "art" is job security for the custodians. You think they work hard? Ask how often they use the $10,000 floor machine to clean the Arena and North gym floors per year. WFB custodians joyfully clean their floors on an almost daily basis with their machine. Shorewood's custodians don't even clean the bleachers and a few of them have a NASTY disposition. They know who they are and it is sad.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.