Downtown Renovations Spark Parking Debate

In discussing whether to approve a special permit needed to move forward with renovation plans for the former M&I buildings in downtown Port Washington, some officials raise concerns about parking needed for such developments.

A debate surrounding the planned height of the former M&I buildings as part of its renovations quickly turned to lower ground as several aldermen raised concerns about parking issues the addition could create.

The council approved the special permit on Tuesday allowing developer Gertjan van den Broek to move forward with plans for the buildings at 122 N. Franklin St. — the property will reach 48 feet in height at its tallest point and city code only allows buildings to be 35 feet in height.

That approval, however, came after a lengthy debate over whether the council was putting the cart before the horse by granting the permit.

The height allows the developer to build its planned 18 condos, as well as retail space on the first floor, with a parking ramp for some cars below the structure — but Ald. Jim Vollmar said he's concerned the condos won't sell without adequate reserved parking, and the city certainly can not give up much of its currently public spots. 

"How are we going to provide parking for these people?" he said. "I think this request is premature. I want this to be a great project for the city, I think (van den Broek has) got a great start. I think he needs to do a little more homework. … I think he needs to have some assurance from the city (on what parking is available)." 

But City Administrator Mark Grams said he doesn't think finding parking is an issue in the city, and that van den Broek is aware of some of the options that will be available to his tenants. 

"There's not a parking issue, there are spaces that are available," Grams said, adding that condo owners could apply for overnight permits in the nearby lots, as one option, or — at worst — have a short walk to get home. 

"People are willing to park a block or two away," in places such as Cedarburg, he added. 

Ald. Dan Becker pointed out that determining the height of the building is actually important to do first because "that obviously dictates the parking they will need."

Do you think parking is an issue in Port?

Tell us in the comments.

Jim February 14, 2013 at 03:48 PM
obviously Mr Grams is used to having his own personal parking spot. Parking is a big issue we have store employees,residents and consumers to park downtown. Count how many open spots that are available, the numbers dont match. The city should look at the property they are swapping Mr Ewig with and build a 2 or 3 level parking structure.
Kathy February 15, 2013 at 01:53 AM
Why Thank You Mr. Groll! I know that cripples are not in City Business Plan, we are not the proper and correct demographic. How do I know this? I served on Habitat for Humanity Board, the city fought a build tooth and nail. Cripples are NOT known for our disposable cash. I am disable or like I say "Differently-abled." How many Handicapped parking spots are downtown on Wisconsin or Grand? Yes, some of the parking lot area's have handicapped spots. The post office has one, and the old courthouse has a few in front. The remaining are on side streets. I'm sure this JUST meets A.D.A, laws. Handicapped tags are given to people who cannot walk more then 50 feet. Not all handicapped people use wheelchairs and not all that do have the shweet electric powered ones. I'm still using my arm powered one because I force myself to walk as much as I can tolerate. If I can find an open spot in front of a shop, I generally can get away with using my cane - Oh happy day..Until I get to a shop with steps - but that is another issue. The Beautification of downtown and the placement of the planters and tree's makes it very difficult for the Shared Taxi vehicles to park and let off a wheelchair client. I know, I use to drive for the company and now a regular passenger. My most disturbing experience with city titled folk was December 23, 2011. While at the county Highway department I parked in a handicapped spot. (Con't) SEE: Parking Rants from a Cripple
Kathy February 15, 2013 at 02:09 AM
)Con't) Parking Rants from a Cripple I parked in the handicapped spot at the Cty Hwy Dept. I was an employee of the Shared taxi. It was the first time I had ever opted to use the spot, as stated I like to walk as much as I can. On that day my legs very wobbley, my handicapped tag displayed in window. No sooner do I enter and two county workers are telling me I have to move my vehicle. I laugh and tell them that I have a handicapped tag. I'm told to bad they need to change a light on the building - Move the car now! I wobble back outside, move my car to the lot 40 feet further and slowly gimp my way back in. I have to walk back out to the lot to get in my vehicle. I called the Hwy Dept to complain. Jason's response " well there was another handicapped spot available, you could have parked there" No I could not, two other vehicles without tags were in the spots. One was city gov't courrier and don't know who else was there. Again, people with handicapped stickers are granted because they cannot walk more then 50 feet. The extra walking caused my syndrome to flare, that was my last day working. I had just opted to come back and try working again. I'm one of the rare ones on SSDI that wants to work. I was afriad the incident would happen again and I'd fall down then not being able to get back up, very typical when Im pushed to walk to far. The Hwy dept should be happy I did not sue, I had witnesses to the incident.
Kathy February 15, 2013 at 02:22 AM
Oh, I will not even start in on the cities efforts maintaining the sidewalk to street ramps. Well okay, twist my arm. If you have ever found yourself cursing at a wheelchair putt putt'n along on the street, that person is risking life and limb because many of the ramps if used will see a wheelchair stuck or the person face first on the road. On my way to vote at TJMS I found myself stuck on a ramp at corners of Holden and Beutel, thankfully I was able to catch me not doin a face first. Round of applause to the several drivers who at stop sign to busy on the phone to see if I needed assistance. *Groan* A big middle finger to the resident to lazy to walk from street to house , the car blocked the sidewalk. I found myself on Holden with arm power and a prayer - school was letting out and lots of traffic a block from the school. Much praise to the Port Police officer less then half block away who did not notice myself and school children forced into street because vehicle blocking sidewalk...it was still there on my return. Thats my long rant. You may remove ear plugs now. :)
Terry February 18, 2013 at 10:33 AM
City is not responsible for clearing those sidewalks and ramps. Its the responsibility of the property owner (unless it is the ramps and sidewalks adjacent to city buildings). As far as the county highway twits, you should have just blown them off. If you were legally parked and there on business, they can't make you move. You were just being too nice to people that clearly didn't deserve it.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »