.
Feedback

The President Kills GOP Groundhog Day

Think Wiilar Romney would have ever given the order to the Seal Team to go after Bin Laden? Think again.

Over the past week conservative heads have been exploding all across America. You see, the Obama campaign has had the bad manners, along with the “liberal media,” of bringing up the anniversary of the raid on Abbottabad. The President had given the order for a team of brave Navy Seals to burst into a compound and take out the man who headed up the killing of 3,000 innocent people on 9/11 and many more at places around the world.

It was bad enough for the right that the President has emerged as the coolest kid in school, but now we are all forced to remember when Barack Obama said go on the raid that took out the Republican’s terror tool.

Of course, last Monday GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney had to be asked if he would have given the same order and of course he said he would, with a dash of a dis on former President Jimmy Carter for good measure. This is a President who few current voters remember except as the guy who goes around fixing up houses and brokering elections. We could use him in Waukesha County in June, by the way.

And of course in the meantime GOP extremists do what they do and started a lame swift-boat campaign against the President.

Now we can only speculate, but of course Mitt wouldn’t, for two reasons. For all his bold talk, Mitt Romney is one of the most risk adverse persons running for office in memory. Look at how he caved like a house of cards when the “family values” wing of the GOP caterwauled over his appointment of openly gay national security advisor Richard Grenell. This is one of many Romney’s profiles in caution, so don’t expect bold and risky from this guy if he gets elected.

Yes, I cannot come up with any deeds of daring-do performed by the current president, but Romney swings way in the opposite direction.

Romney’s life has been one giant safety net. After growing up in a life of total ease, Romney’s “mission trip” as a Mormon was more like an extended vacation in France. Bill Bain enticed Romney into coming onto his company with a promise that the venture would be totally risk free for him.

Going on to his signature project, the Salt Lake City Olympics, Mr. “No Bail outs for Detroit” took a record amount of federal prop-up money.

As for the recent primary, Romney has more than demonstrated the lack of courage to stand up for a single thing he was for prior to going through the conservative wringer. What makes anyone expect he’s up to the tough decisions?

That fateful night before the decision to launch the Bin Laden raid, not a single member of the National Security Team gave the mission more than a 50 percent chance of succeeding. The decision was the President’s and the President’s alone, and the blame would have been all his. It is highly doubtful that Risk-Adverse Romney would have given that order, even if we ignore the second point I’m going to make.

This reason is more instructive of his party.

There is no way a Republican president would have ever gone after Bin Laden. They certainly didn’t for the seven succeeding years of the Bush administration. Remember Bush saying he didn’t care where Bin Laden was? Of course he didn’t.

Bin Laden was the GOP equivalent of Punxsutawney Phil.

Remember every time there was an election following 9/11, or Bush’s poll numbers dipped or there was something they wanted to ram through Congress? Like the guys in the top hats in Pennsylvania, out came Bin Laden, usually in the form of some video that we’d find out later was weeks or months old. Yup. Six more weeks of terror.

It’s bad enough that Obama has been going around telling jokes at John Boehner’s expense, or warbling Al Green, or slow talking on Jimmy Fallon. The President had gone and had the GOP Terror Tool killed.

And now we have the Greek chorus of Republican surrogates on FOX “NEWS” and all over the blogs and on talk radio (Republicans don’t have lives you see) railing about how bringing up this achievement is soooo inappropriate (stifle laugh).

This, from a party that never failed to wave the bloody shirt of 9/11 high and long. The 2004 GOP National Convention was particularly ghoulish, with the 9/11 motif in the background and constant reminders of the attack and the need to cozy up with the Daddy party. Of course it was made even more ghoulish with Rudy Guiliani’s appearance aging into a strong resemblance to silent movie vampire Max Schreck.

None of this should be surprising, because the GOP has another tool, and that one is government. This tool is designed to enable upward income distribution and nothing more. And with the Bin Laden Terror Tool gone, President Obama has made the GOP’s ability to retain the other tool just that much harder. The poor dears will be left to now totally relying on dumpsters full of vulture billionaire cash in an attempt to fool or disgust voters.

And for those of you who are upset that the President’s campaign has the gall to bring up the raid, despite the fact that the GOP blasted 9/11 at us through a fire hose for seven years, blame Romney. Mitt has for months been using that phony line that the President has been going around “apologizing” for America, which of course is total nonsense.

So a lesson to Mitt. When someone owns a giant flyswatter such as the killing of Osama, a little Mormon temperance would be in order. Republican’s expect Democrats not to use their advantages, but that isn’t going to happen here. This is not John Kerry running this time.

Being a lawyer, Barack Obama knows malpractice when he sees it.

Mike May 9, 2012 at 01:28 pm
Keith, your Willard reference sounds as lame as when the Rev. Al (Play the race card) Sharpton says it.
Keith Schmitz May 9, 2012 at 01:35 pm
You going to be just as diligent about insulting remarks about the president on these blogs? Whine, whine, whine.
Mike May 9, 2012 at 01:54 pm
Never insulted my president. Unlike the left, I can live with who was elected. I don't insult him, carry signs to demean him or protest his appearance.
Johnny Blade May 9, 2012 at 03:46 pm
Does anyone on here know how WTC Building 7 fell?? .. To believe the Government STORY is ridiculous .. and here the ignorant bloggers are debating which puppet is better and which MOB family (democrat/Republican) is better .. It is laugh out loud funny ... Here you have a NOBEL PEACE PRIZE "WINNER" assassinating Osama and US citizens like al-awaqi .. I mean give me a break .. NOBEL PEACE PRIZE .. this is freakin Orwells 1984 ... al-awaqi was a guest at the whitehouse ... and you mindless lemmings write articles like this .. mindboggling
Bob McBride May 9, 2012 at 05:16 pm
Not good enough. I'm still not voting for him.
Keith Schmitz May 10, 2012 at 01:12 am
Man, you are a Sears catalog of paranoid conspiracies.
Look, even though the whole WTC thing is for sure suspicious, but the very idea that those two massive screw ups could pull off something like that.
Keith Schmitz May 10, 2012 at 01:14 am
BTW -- Barack Obama this afternoon just proved that he is the President for the 21st century. There is no political advantage in him coming out for gay marriage, no matter how much you imagine it.
Romney would no way have the guts or class to do something like this.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 01:18 am
Keith admit it: You hate Mitt because he can earn more in one day than you could steal from the taxpayers after a decade of evil planning.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 01:22 am
A real President with balls would have cut off aid to a nation who harbors someone like Bin Laden. The pakitupyourassistans looked the US in the eye and lied.
But they have a Muslim brother in the White House, so the checks keep coming.
Keith Schmitz May 10, 2012 at 01:24 am
Hey Craig. Tarzan is looking for you.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 01:29 am
Blade you are paranoid, says Keith. He then goes on to say Bush wasn't smart enough to 'pull it off'.
Keith: you're a chump.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 01:31 am
Sorry Keith I don't speak Liberal.
I have no idea what you mean.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 02:20 am
Only a President with no respect for religion would come out for gay marriage.
Civil unions are enough, you don't have to attack heterosexual marriage to be noticed.
Randy1949 May 10, 2012 at 02:49 am
Except, Craig, North Carolina also just outlawed legal protection for civil unions too. That's always been the argument -- why the need for same-sex 'marriage' when civil unions do almost the same thing?
North Carolina has just proved why majority rule should not hold sway over minority rights.
Luke May 10, 2012 at 03:40 am
@Keith
<<<<BTW -- Barack Obama this afternoon just proved that he is the President for the 21st century. There is no political advantage in him coming out for gay marriage, no matter how much you imagine it.>>>> Well, according to both the liberal and conservative press, it's because Biden told the press that Obama was in favor of it a few days earlier. Subsequently, Obama's spokesman said that Obama had not indicated that he had changed his mind from what he had said during the 2010 campaign. So, contrary to being courageous, Obama was forced out into the open. The issue was already settled as far as the press was concerned, so Obama could have flown under the radar on the issue until after the election, when he could have claimed he had an epiphany that turned him the other way . However, after the Biden disclosure Obama had no alternative but to say that he consulted his wife and kids, and they turned him around. Considering this is a thread about Obama's courage, I couldn't have asked for better news as evidence of the contrary.
Steve ® May 10, 2012 at 12:38 pm
So gays can get married as of today?
Alfred May 10, 2012 at 01:02 pm
If gays can marry what about polygamists? polyandrists? Can Keith marry his sister now? Can Keith marry his putty cat now?
Bob McBride May 10, 2012 at 01:02 pm
Steve, as of yesterday if they do, they get an implied fist-bump from the President, thanks to the efforts of Malia, Sasha and Michelle. I think I heard Bo was humping his leg as well to get the point across, but I could be wrong about that. Regardless, it's almost too extraordinary to believe - is it not? He has fully evolved (Joe Biden pushed him out of the closet).
FWIW, I support gay marriage. I didn't need to evolve or talk to my family about it. All I had to do was apply logic and common sense to it and determine that it hurts no one. It's also about 3 steps from the bottom of a list of 20 or so issues that would be of importance to me as it relates to how I cast my vote in any election.
Craig May 10, 2012 at 01:37 pm
Randy: even without civil unions they can accomplish the same things through legal documentation. Get a will, Power of attorney, Health Care Power of Attorney, etc.
The President defiles the sanctity of marriage for butt blaster votes? I think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing with the desire to destroy religion, our economy, and family values. I guess the next step is to make it acceptable to have sex with an animal?
Steve ® May 10, 2012 at 02:51 pm
Bob, so what you are saying is they can have their reception at the white house and sip on Budweiser?
Randy1949 May 10, 2012 at 03:20 pm
@Craig -- So some people have to spend thousands of dollars in legal fees to get the same things as you and I got for our $20 marriage license?
However your choice of wording gives your ignorant prejudice away. Butt-blasters? Really? I don't think the sanctity of my marriage is defiled in any way by letting couples marry, whether they're of two difference races or the same sex.
Luke May 11, 2012 at 11:04 am
Keith Schmitz
<<<<<BTW -- Barack Obama this afternoon just proved that he is the President for the 21st century. There is no political advantage in him coming out for gay marriage, no matter how much you imagine it.>>>> "No political advantage," Keith? If you read the article below, you will see that Obama was for it before he was against it before he was for it. It appears that he changes his mind as the political winds would have it, starting in 1996. Where's the courage, Keith? http://m.npr.org/story/152417874?url=/2012/05/10/152417874/weekly-standard-obamas-evolution-is-insincere&ft=1&f=
Keith Schmitz May 11, 2012 at 11:55 am
Like I've said. The same people who think Obama did it for the votes are the same people who think gays are that way out of choice.
The politics is a wash, if not a possible loss in some swing states. Romney would never have that courage, as his prep school incident proves.
Bob McBride May 11, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Steve, I think that particular ceremony is reserved for sorting out minor, pointless disagreements between parties of differing racial backgrounds - within the range of press photographers.
Steve ® May 11, 2012 at 01:03 pm
Oh okay, thanks.
wait.. What about two gays getting married BUT one is a white hispanic and the other black. The in laws do not get along much and sometimes they sneak around at night in hoodies to play pranks. Can this couple have a reception at the WH? Hits all angles, gays and race, invite the press to take pictures and Joe Biden can entertain the kids with his jokes. "Stand up Chuck"
Bob McBride May 11, 2012 at 02:24 pm
Steve, I think that given that scenario, should a dust-up erupt at the post-nupt celebration, an emergency Rose Garden Beer Summit might be in order. And yes they should make sure that Joe Biden understands that a wheelchair isn't a mobile Stratolounger.
Johnny Blade May 11, 2012 at 04:42 pm
gays are that way out of choice.... Your right there is NO free will, it is the electrical impluses in my head .. so do you believe murders are born murders??
Randy1949 May 11, 2012 at 04:48 pm
@Johnny Blade -- The psychiatric community disagrees with you. The reputable psychiatric community at least. Sexual orientation is innate and is something we have little control over. The only control we have is to be celibate or not, which even some heterosexuals seem to have difficulty doing.
Why don't you try holding you tongue until you know what you're talking about.
Keith Schmitz May 11, 2012 at 06:48 pm
If I would respect you, I'd be so damned hurt. But I'm not.
Keith Schmitz May 11, 2012 at 06:49 pm
Johnny, excellent job of playing stupid.
Being gay is not a lifestyle choice. Hating them is.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.