Over the past week conservative heads have been exploding all across America. You see, the Obama campaign has had the bad manners, along with the “liberal media,” of bringing up the anniversary of the raid on Abbottabad. The President had given the order for a team of brave Navy Seals to burst into a compound and take out the man who headed up the killing of 3,000 innocent people on 9/11 and many more at places around the world.
It was bad enough for the right that the President has emerged as the coolest kid in school, but now we are all forced to remember when Barack Obama said go on the raid that took out the Republican’s terror tool.
Of course, last Monday GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney had to be asked if he would have given the same order and of course he said he would, with a dash of a dis on former President Jimmy Carter for good measure. This is a President who few current voters remember except as the guy who goes around fixing up houses and brokering elections. We could use him in Waukesha County in June, by the way.
And of course in the meantime GOP extremists do what they do and started a lame swift-boat campaign against the President.
Now we can only speculate, but of course Mitt wouldn’t, for two reasons. For all his bold talk, Mitt Romney is one of the most risk adverse persons running for office in memory. Look at how he caved like a house of cards when the “family values” wing of the GOP caterwauled over his appointment of openly gay national security advisor Richard Grenell. This is one of many Romney’s profiles in caution, so don’t expect bold and risky from this guy if he gets elected.
Yes, I cannot come up with any deeds of daring-do performed by the current president, but Romney swings way in the opposite direction.
Romney’s life has been one giant safety net. After growing up in a life of total ease, Romney’s “mission trip” as a Mormon was more like an extended vacation in France. Bill Bain enticed Romney into coming onto his company with a promise that the venture would be totally risk free for him.
Going on to his signature project, the Salt Lake City Olympics, Mr. “No Bail outs for Detroit” took a record amount of federal prop-up money.
As for the recent primary, Romney has more than demonstrated the lack of courage to stand up for a single thing he was for prior to going through the conservative wringer. What makes anyone expect he’s up to the tough decisions?
That fateful night before the decision to launch the Bin Laden raid, not a single member of the National Security Team gave the mission more than a 50 percent chance of succeeding. The decision was the President’s and the President’s alone, and the blame would have been all his. It is highly doubtful that Risk-Adverse Romney would have given that order, even if we ignore the second point I’m going to make.
This reason is more instructive of his party.
There is no way a Republican president would have ever gone after Bin Laden. They certainly didn’t for the seven succeeding years of the Bush administration. Remember Bush saying he didn’t care where Bin Laden was? Of course he didn’t.
Bin Laden was the GOP equivalent of Punxsutawney Phil.
Remember every time there was an election following 9/11, or Bush’s poll numbers dipped or there was something they wanted to ram through Congress? Like the guys in the top hats in Pennsylvania, out came Bin Laden, usually in the form of some video that we’d find out later was weeks or months old. Yup. Six more weeks of terror.
It’s bad enough that Obama has been going around telling jokes at John Boehner’s expense, or warbling Al Green, or slow talking on Jimmy Fallon. The President had gone and had the GOP Terror Tool killed.
And now we have the Greek chorus of Republican surrogates on FOX “NEWS” and all over the blogs and on talk radio (Republicans don’t have lives you see) railing about how bringing up this achievement is soooo inappropriate (stifle laugh).
This, from a party that never failed to wave the bloody shirt of 9/11 high and long. The 2004 GOP National Convention was particularly ghoulish, with the 9/11 motif in the background and constant reminders of the attack and the need to cozy up with the Daddy party. Of course it was made even more ghoulish with Rudy Guiliani’s appearance aging into a strong resemblance to silent movie vampire Max Schreck.
None of this should be surprising, because the GOP has another tool, and that one is government. This tool is designed to enable upward income distribution and nothing more. And with the Bin Laden Terror Tool gone, President Obama has made the GOP’s ability to retain the other tool just that much harder. The poor dears will be left to now totally relying on dumpsters full of vulture billionaire cash in an attempt to fool or disgust voters.
And for those of you who are upset that the President’s campaign has the gall to bring up the raid, despite the fact that the GOP blasted 9/11 at us through a fire hose for seven years, blame Romney. Mitt has for months been using that phony line that the President has been going around “apologizing” for America, which of course is total nonsense.
So a lesson to Mitt. When someone owns a giant flyswatter such as the killing of Osama, a little Mormon temperance would be in order. Republican’s expect Democrats not to use their advantages, but that isn’t going to happen here. This is not John Kerry running this time.
Being a lawyer, Barack Obama knows malpractice when he sees it.
Look, even though the whole WTC thing is for sure suspicious, but the very idea that those two massive screw ups could pull off something like that.
Romney would no way have the guts or class to do something like this.
But they have a Muslim brother in the White House, so the checks keep coming.
Keith: you're a chump.
I have no idea what you mean.
Civil unions are enough, you don't have to attack heterosexual marriage to be noticed.
North Carolina has just proved why majority rule should not hold sway over minority rights.
<<<<BTW -- Barack Obama this afternoon just proved that he is the President for the 21st century. There is no political advantage in him coming out for gay marriage, no matter how much you imagine it.>>>> Well, according to both the liberal and conservative press, it's because Biden told the press that Obama was in favor of it a few days earlier. Subsequently, Obama's spokesman said that Obama had not indicated that he had changed his mind from what he had said during the 2010 campaign. So, contrary to being courageous, Obama was forced out into the open. The issue was already settled as far as the press was concerned, so Obama could have flown under the radar on the issue until after the election, when he could have claimed he had an epiphany that turned him the other way . However, after the Biden disclosure Obama had no alternative but to say that he consulted his wife and kids, and they turned him around. Considering this is a thread about Obama's courage, I couldn't have asked for better news as evidence of the contrary.
FWIW, I support gay marriage. I didn't need to evolve or talk to my family about it. All I had to do was apply logic and common sense to it and determine that it hurts no one. It's also about 3 steps from the bottom of a list of 20 or so issues that would be of importance to me as it relates to how I cast my vote in any election.
The President defiles the sanctity of marriage for butt blaster votes? I think he is a wolf in sheep's clothing with the desire to destroy religion, our economy, and family values. I guess the next step is to make it acceptable to have sex with an animal?
However your choice of wording gives your ignorant prejudice away. Butt-blasters? Really? I don't think the sanctity of my marriage is defiled in any way by letting couples marry, whether they're of two difference races or the same sex.
<<<<<BTW -- Barack Obama this afternoon just proved that he is the President for the 21st century. There is no political advantage in him coming out for gay marriage, no matter how much you imagine it.>>>> "No political advantage," Keith? If you read the article below, you will see that Obama was for it before he was against it before he was for it. It appears that he changes his mind as the political winds would have it, starting in 1996. Where's the courage, Keith? http://m.npr.org/story/152417874?url=/2012/05/10/152417874/weekly-standard-obamas-evolution-is-insincere&ft=1&f=
The politics is a wash, if not a possible loss in some swing states. Romney would never have that courage, as his prep school incident proves.
wait.. What about two gays getting married BUT one is a white hispanic and the other black. The in laws do not get along much and sometimes they sneak around at night in hoodies to play pranks. Can this couple have a reception at the WH? Hits all angles, gays and race, invite the press to take pictures and Joe Biden can entertain the kids with his jokes. "Stand up Chuck"
Why don't you try holding you tongue until you know what you're talking about.
Being gay is not a lifestyle choice. Hating them is.