.
Feedback

Comparing Milwaukee Animal Control to Other Cities

Animal Control in Reno, Nevada and Austin, Texas have similar intake rates as Milwaukee but save 91% of the animals in their care. Milwaukee saves 51%.

Many people still say that No Kill animal sheltering is impossible but the facts are proving them wrong. No Kill animal sheltering is described as saving 90% or better of all incoming animals.  This leaves a very generous 10% allowance for those animals that are hopelessly suffering or dangerously aggressive.


The table below shows two other major metropolitan areas in America that have attained a 90 % or better save rate. There are currently over 50 No Kill communities in the United States. You can see where they are by clicking here.

They have done it by implementing all eleven steps of the No Kill Equation.  No Kill animal sheltering is more cost effective and more publicly acceptable than the traditional "catch and kIll" model of animal sheltering that Milwaukee currently embraces.

The 2012 year to date statistics for Milwaukee are not showing much improvement over 2011. You can view them by clicking here.

The greatest risk to companion animals in Milwaukee is that they will enter Milwaukee Area Domestic Animal Control Commission and be killed. The board of directors is failing to make life-saving changes to procedures and programs to save the lives of animals in Milwaukee County.

MILWAUKEE, Wisconsin

County Population 952,532
City Population 597,867


Animal Intake (2011)
Dogs: 5378
Cats: 6943

Save rate:
Dogs: 64%
Cats:39%

Average Save Rate: 51.5% RENO, Nevada

County Population 425,710
City Population 227,511

Animal Intake (2011) 
Dogs: 6977
Cats: 4103

Save rate:
Dogs: 91%
Cats: 91%

Average Save Rate: 91%

AUSTIN, Texas


County Population 1,026,158
City Population 820,611


Animal Intake (2011)
Dogs: 9688
Cats:  5391

Save Rate:
Dogs: 91%
Cats:91%

Average Save Rate: 91%

Peace September 11, 2012 at 12:37 am
Milwaukee can do better, if other cities were sucessful, why can't we be? But we need the leadership (Madacc Board of Directors mainly) to embrace it, and make changes for the better, not turn a blind eye and go on with 'business as usual'. One step at a time, Milwaukee can achieve No Kill.
Sheila Johnston September 11, 2012 at 12:20 pm
I would like to erge the board of MADACC to become familiar with and implement the changes needed to turn Milwaukee into one of the pioneering metropolitan areas to become No-Kill. It is not only good for the animals, it is good for humans too. It can help to improve the image of the city and reunite lost beloved pets with their owners, a win-win scenario for all.
Linda Schultz September 11, 2012 at 11:14 pm
There is definitely a glaring and deadly difference between Milwaukee when comparing to Reno and Austin. What surprises me most is that Austin is a larger metropolitan area > larger intake with an amazing report card. Thankfully, articles like this gives us in Milwaukee, the chance to take a look at what we have, and decide what we want. Who should we contact to tell them we want to model Milwaukee after Austin?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.