.
Feedback

Should Couples Combine Finances?

The topic of combining finances is one that frequently comes up with younger clients and clients that are remarrying. Here are some of the common questions I hear, and my typical response.

As hard as it is to believe, the world is changing! The topic of combining finances is one that frequently comes up with younger clients and clients that are remarrying, although it is certainly applicable to all couples. Couples can be traditional married couples, same-sex couples, engaged couples, life-long roommate couples, and every set of two (or more?) people in between. As more people wait until they are older to get married, there is a level of independence that has been achieved they may not want to give up. Combining finances can represent a loss of independence, control, and even privacy. Here are some of the most common questions I hear:

Should we combine all our accounts?

Anytime a question starts with “should” it is a clue that we are talking about a cultural norm, or money script. “Should” isn’t a good reason to do anything. People need to make decisions for them, and not worry about what others tell them they “should” do.

So it is a good idea to combine accounts? That is completely up to the couple, but both parties need to be comfortable with the decision to combine accounts. I have seen couples successfully maintain separate accounts and split the household bills in a way that works for them. I have even seen couples that “split” the children, so that each parent is responsible for the expenses of 1 child (assuming there is an even number of children). That being said, you have to find what works for you. At a minimum, it might be a good idea to have a joint checking account to pay bills out of because most couples don’t want to write checks to the other for the rent, as this can feel a little too much like college roommates.

Should I keep a separate account from my partner?

There is nothing wrong with keeping a separate account. If it makes you feel more comfortable to have some money stashed away in a personal savings account, then do it. This can also help keep some purchases “hidden” from your partner like gifts. Nothing is less romantic than a call from your partner asking what you bought at the flower shop!

Should I keep a secret account my partner doesn’t know about?

What is the reason for the secret account? Are you uncomfortable with sharing your entire financial picture? Are you planning to leave and want some cash built up? I am not usually comfortable with secret accounts unless there is a really good reason. In the case that one partner keeps a secret account out of fear, or other extreme emotions, I might recommend talking with a Money Psychologist that can help them articulate the reasons for the secret account. I don’t see anything wrong with keeping a separate account, but secret money probably isn’t healthy.

Will combining (or not combining) finances affect our ability to get financing?

Not to my knowledge. If both parties are applying for a loan, then all of their accounts can be listed to show credit worthiness, and it really doesn’t matter if the accounts are jointly held. I honestly can’t think of a reason this would affect the ability to get credit.

What are the downsides to combining finances?

One downside to combining finances is you may feel like you are giving up your independence. Your beliefs about money with drive what you are comfortable doing, and I am a big believer in doing what feels right when it comes to things like managing money.

Another downside is if you are married and live in a community property state (such as Wisconsin), putting money into a joint account means you are effectively giving your spouse 50% of the money. Although you are entitled to keep 100% of gifts and inheritances you receive, if you put the inherited money in a joint account, you may be giving half of it to your spouse. This really only becomes an issue in the case of a divorce.

The question isn’t if you “should” combine finances, it is if you want to. You don’t need to feel guilty for wanting to maintain some level of independence by keeping a separate account. Whatever you decide, I highly recommend that you keep the lines of communication open about the topic. If you have chosen to be in a relationship, I believe your partner deserves to have an understanding of your personal financial situation, especially if you are taking out joint loans, or if they are depending on you to provide income for the family. If you are having trouble discussing your finances, seek out a Money Psychologist to help facilitate the conversation. They aren’t easy to find, so shoot me an e-mail for a referral to one in the Milwaukee area.

So what do you think? Have you chosen to combine finances, or to keep them separate? Is there anything you would like to add to this list? Feel free to share in the comments section below! 

Alan Moore is a fee-only financial planner and founder of Serenity Financial Consulting in Shorewood WI. Follow him on Twitter @R_Alan_Moore. You can contact him at alan@serenityfc.com, 414-455-5313, or visit his website at www.SerenityFC.com. Want more education? Download your free guide to the “10 Easy Steps To Securing Your Financial Future Today.”

mau October 20, 2012 at 07:07 pm
If you're going into a marriage with the attitude of mine and yours, then don't get married. Stay single, living under individual roofs and don't commit. We have both combined and individual finances but make joint decisions. We went into marriage as a couple.
Community property and inheritance in Wisconsin can get complicated in a divorce. In my brother's case he owned a business and equipment, house and property, farmland (from his 1st marriage) plus inheritance from our parents. He had to pay 50% of any profits made from said assets, to his ex-wife. So that meant going through 18 years of financial records to determine who much profit was made from assets he accrued before his 2nd marriage.
mau October 20, 2012 at 07:08 pm
Typo "how".
Randy1949 October 20, 2012 at 07:30 pm
I agree, mau. If a young couple is starting out life with that attitude of not sharing, that's probably a bad sign for the marriage. But sometimes you have a case of two people marrying for the second time, late in life, with children from previous marriages who could be disinherited from 'family' assets if there isn't some kind of property agreement ahead of time.
mau October 20, 2012 at 11:30 pm
@Randy1949, I agree. But personally I would never do this a 2nd time. I think I see more problems with the couples who do not share the finances. Especially with credit cards. It is not good to keep secrets or hide things especially money. I will have to say I think there is a problem when someone feels they are losing their independence. That is someone who is insecure and I have never been or felt that way.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Nuitari June 19, 2013 at 03:45 pm
I hate this.
Bob McBride June 19, 2013 at 03:52 pm
Can you stop hating it for an hour?
Greg June 19, 2013 at 07:22 pm
I blame the internet for bigotry towards globes.
Greg June 14, 2013 at 08:56 pm
Ankeny NewPatch rocks!
Vicki Bennett June 19, 2013 at 04:19 pm
This makes absolutely no sense to the normal reader. What the heck are your talking about??
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.