.
Feedback

Financial Porn: 3 Reasons to Turn Off the TV

It seems like every time you turn on the TV there is someone yelling at you, telling you what stocks to buy. If you can’t seem to turn off the TV, here are some tips to help you do so.

It seems like every time you turn on the TV there is someone yelling at you, telling you what stocks to buy and which ones are going down the tube. It’s as if they can predict the future, or at least know something that us lowly investors don’t know. My favorite is when they ask two experts what a recent job report means, and they give completely different answers. It makes it hard to know who you should believe, and what changes you need to be making to your investment portfolio.

24/7 news channels have had to fill their air time with some absurd material, and financial talking heads seems to fit the bill. If you can’t seem to turn off the TV, here are some tips to help you do so.

Active management:  We all want to believe that we are better than average. In fact, 93 percent of drivers say they are above average drivers. This is called Illusory Superiority. This is evident in active investment management strategies, in which the manager believes they are smarter than the average investor, and will therefore beat the market. People pay really high fees to these market timers, and yet research consistently shows active managers aren’t able to beat the market. They typically underperform by 1 percent per year. Why? Because they can’t predict the future any better than the rest of us. The talking heads on TV believe they know something that the rest of us don’t, so they graciously share their knowledge. Random thought, but if they really believe what they say, they wouldn’t share it with us… they would just sit back and make a ton of money. 

Poor performance: Financial “Experts” like Jim Cramer make a lot of noise, but they are actually not all that good at actually picking stocks. Cramer will recommend buying hundreds of stocks in a given month. Every time you buy or sell, you have to pay a trading fee. Even if you are able to beat the market, you will lose due to the effect of trading costs on your returns. Investors in general underperform the market by a whopping 6 percent because they try to time the market.

Don’t even know you: A colleague of mine likes to say, “Personal finance is more personal than it is finance.” This statement is so true. You shouldn’t take advice from someone on TV that doesn’t know you and your personal situation, especially when it comes to your investment portfolio. In fact, you shouldn’t be taking advice from me either! Not unless we work together and I know enough about you to make recommendations. Always be weary of people making recommendations when they don’t even know who you are. General advice is one thing… making stock recommendations is another.

I understand wanting to beat the market. I wish I could tell my clients that I know how to do so, but it just isn’t possible. The only thing you will get from watching Financial Porn is unnecessary stress. Don’t let the talking heads affect how you manage your personal finances. If you need some assistance, seek out an independent financial planner to help you. But be sure your next step is to turn off the TV!  

So what do you think? Do you enjoy the financial media? Have you ever followed their recommendations? Any tips you would like to add? Feel free to share!

Alan Moore is a fee-only financial planner and founder of Serenity Financial Consulting in Shorewood WI. Follow him on Twitter @R_Alan_Moore. You can contact him at alan@serenityfc.com, 414-455-5313, or visit his website at www.SerenityFC.com. Want more education? Download your free guide to the “10 Easy Steps To Securing Your Financial Future Today.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

North Shore Newbie December 17, 2012 at 09:21 pm
It sounds to me like what you're saying (and I've actually made this argument myself) is that most people are much better off investing in an index fund rather than individual stocks. For the average investor, the time, energy and level of knowledge they would require to try to beat the market would preclude them from investing in individual companies. Am I correct?
Alan Moore, MS, CFP® December 18, 2012 at 09:46 pm
You are correct. I believe every investor is significantly better off investing in index funds and individual stocks.
I don't believe anyone, including the smartest people on wall street, know which stocks are going up and which will go down. In the end, actively managed mutual funds underperform index funds over time. And investing in individual stocks puts too much of your retirement future in the hands of a single company. Just not a good idea.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.