.
Feedback

Financial Challenge — Should You Choose To Accept It

The challenge, should you choose to accept it, is to raise your 401(k) contributions by at least 1%, and I will send you a $10 gift card to Walmart to help with holiday shopping.

This post is part of the “Save 1% More” initiative started by Jim Blankenship, CFP at FinancialDucksInARow.com. We are encouraging Americans to start saving 1% more into their retirement plans.


Americans are lousy savers. We can blame it on low wages, a tough economy, or a multitude of other reasons, but the end result is the same... we aren’t saving enough for retirement. The average American family has $35,000 in retirement accounts, can’t afford a $1,000 emergency expense, and only 38% believe they will retire comfortably.

So what can we do about it? You can’t change how much others are saving, but you can certainly change how much YOU are saving.

For many workers, it is open enrollment time. This is your chance to select the optimal health insurance plan, opt into using tax-advantaged accounts such as Flexible Spending Accounts (FSA’s) and your opportunity to reevaluate your 401(k) contributions for 2013.

The challenge, should you choose to accept it, is to raise your 401(k) contributions by at least 1%. This means if you were contributing 10% in 2012, you have to move to 11%. If you weren’t contributing at all, then start at 1% for 2013. And 1% is just a minimum... try for 3%, or even 5%!

What do you get for your efforts? Well, if you e-mail me at alan@serenityfc.com to let me know you have raised your contribution at least 1%, I will send you a $10 gift card to Walmart to help with holiday shopping. That’s right... not only do you save more money for retirement, you get a free $10 gift card. I will make this available to the first 10 people that e-mail me some sort of evidence of their new contribution amount. Please be sure you black out account numbers and personal information!

Still not convinced? For a 30-year-old worker making $60,000 per year, a 1% increase in savings could result in saving $114,710.42 by retirement! They are only saving $50 a month, but could end of with over $100k in savings! And that doesn’t even account for potential pay raises in the future. Just think what would happen if you increased by 1% every year for the next 10 years.

What if you don’t have an employer sponsored retirement plan? Then setup to automatically contribute 1% of your paycheck to a Roth or Traditional IRA. You can have your HR department do this, or have it auto draft from your bank account each month.

So... are you willing to take me up on my challenge? I sure hope so... Remember, you may not be able to single handedly increase the savings rate in America... but you can increase yours. Good luck!

Other Financial Bloggers Participating:
From Michele Clark: Employer Retirement Accounts: 2013 Contribution Limits
From Roger Wohlner: Need Post-Election Financial Advice? Try the 1% Solution
From Sterling Raskie: A Nifty Little Trick to Increase Savings
From Theresa Chen Wan: Saving for Retirement: The 1% Challenge for 2013
From Mike Piper: Investing Blog Roundup: Saving 1% More
From Robert Wasilewski: Increase Savings Rate By 1%
From Steve Stewart: Seriously. What’s 1 percent gonna do?
From Jim Blankenship: Add Your First 1% to Your 401(k)
From Laura Scharr: In Crisis: Personal Savings- Here Are Six Steps to Improve Your Retirement Security

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.