.
Feedback

4 Ways to Become A Better Consumer of Research

We are inundated with research studies that are intended to make sense of the complex world we live in. But how do you know if the research you read about is valid?

We are inundated with research studies that are intended to make sense of the complex world we live in. Marketers use it to understand and influence our purchasing decisions, while social scientists use it to understand human behaviors. But how do you know if the research you read about is valid? How do you know if it can be trusted?

Know who paid for the research study: There is an inherent level of bias when conducting research. The ways you ask questions, the order questions are asked, how findings are interpreted, and more, rely on a human element. You want to know who paid for the study to understand what pressure they might have put on the researcher. Does the financier have anything to gain or lose by the study’s results? Although many researchers do their best to eliminate human bias, if a tobacco company financed a study that found cigarettes are good for your health, be cautious.

Know who is talking about the research: When you learn about research results, chances are you are hearing from someone other than the researcher. Most people do not actually read the researchers published paper, and therefore rely on a journalist, blogger, or other writer to make the research findings understandable. The thing is, many journalists have never taken a basic statistics class, much less have formal training in how to interpret research findings or critically evaluate research methodology. Be wary of anyone that interprets research findings without having learned how to properly do so.

Know the difference between causation and correlation: One of the hardest concepts students must grasp when learning how to conduct research is the difference between causation and correlation. Causation refers to one thing causing another, also called cause and effect. For example people, who smoke develop lung cancer – ie. smoking caused cancer. Correlation refers to two things happening at the same time, however if one caused the other is uncertain. For example, girls who watch soap operas are more likely to develop an eating disorder. Did watching soap operas cause the eating disorder, or did the eating disorder cause them to watch soap operas? Or was it that the girls had poor body images, and therefore watched soap operas and had an eating disorder? It is very difficult for a research study to show causation. Most research results show correlations. Anytime someone tells you that a recent research study showed one thing caused another, be critical.

Know that statements of fact are not research: Another difficult lesson students of research much learn is that the research process does not produce statements of fact. You may hear “The research study proved that…” when in reality, the study simply found support for the researcher’s theory. Research typically relies on averages, so research shouldn’t use words like: never, always, none, all. Look for “softer” language in research such as: most, many, some, few.

Let’s see what you have learned. Click this link to see a commercial by 5-hour ENERGY® where the actress discusses a research study they conducted. Pay attention to the four lessons you just learned. What do you see?

The main takeaway for me is that the commercial would lead you to believe that 73 percent of doctors would recommend 5-hour ENERGY®. If you listen closely (and read the fine print) you realize that only 56 percent would specifically recommend 5-hour ENERGY® to their healthy patients that are already taking energy supplements. How many doctors have healthy patients? And how many of those healthy patients are already taking an energy supplement? Most importantly, how did the researcher frame the question? The doctors might have simply responded that if their health patients were taking an energy supplement, they would recommend it be low calorie. And since 5-hour ENERGY® is low calorie, it would meet these criteria.

So what do you think? Do you have other examples of bad research? What about research that you felt was poorly interpreted by a writer? Share your thoughts in the comments!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Shorewood Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Brian Carlson September 1, 2012 at 12:21 pm
Really important blog here Alan. Critical thinking, thankfully, has become a part of most current educational standards but it is far from the norm in a culture that is force fed so much propaganda. Being able to navigate the messages in tact is like heading across a cow pasture under the light of a full moon. You can see but you have to look sharply!
Brian Carlson September 1, 2012 at 12:21 pm
Send more. Unpack propaganda techniques for us.
Alan Moore, MS, CFP® September 1, 2012 at 02:20 pm
Brian, thanks for the great comments. I agree that educational standards have gotten better, and that we need to continue to focus on teaching critical thinking skills. Research results are used by both sides of an argument to "prove" their side, when in reality the study simply informs the discussion.
Thanks for the feedback!
NObama 2012 September 1, 2012 at 03:24 pm
Progressive’s love to promote critical thinking skills, basically it’s the same thing as outcome-based education which is used to undermine parental authority. Critical thinking teaches students to be critical of everything. Studies confirm that people who are critical of everything are shown to have a pessimistic outlook on life i.e. most of the Progressives that post on The Patch. The Progressives I know show no ethical standards, don’t believe in ethical leadership, freedom, generosity and kindness and they usually are the so-called critical thinkers in our society.
Lyle Ruble September 1, 2012 at 04:12 pm
@NObama 2012....You are a fine example why it is imperative to teach critical thinking.
N. Peske September 1, 2012 at 07:09 pm
In my work as an editor and ghostwriter, I deal with research from published journals that is almost always available via Google Scholar. I read the abstract and trust my client, the expert, to have read the entire article--that's the expert's department.
Also, when it comes to nutritional information and advice, it can be very confusing to sort out what's what. The media tends to jump on one study that's just been released because it is new. I do rely on certain experts, including my nutritionist, who goes to the big conferences. Thanks for pointing out the correlation/causation issue--that's a common mistake I see in reporting. You described the problem succinctly!
Alan Moore, MS, CFP® September 1, 2012 at 07:30 pm
N. Peske, your comment reminds me of a recent study about the link between the age of fathers and the rate of autism in their children. Some news articles were titled "Autism linked to older fathers" while others were titled "Older fathers cause autism." It is amazing how quickly correlation became causation.
Thanks for the great comments. Keep them coming!
Jay Sykes September 2, 2012 at 10:53 am
My favorite 'use' of statistics to sell a product: "Four out of five dentists recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gf_Jk1zLisg
Larry Booth September 2, 2012 at 07:39 pm
My favorite comment about the use of data from surveys was a letter to the editor in the Wall St Journal in the early 80s. "Torture a statistic long enough and it will confess to anything". You see that in the political rhetoric today; both sides use the same data to justify their position.
Jon September 13, 2012 at 02:17 pm
It's funny that you provide an anecdote regarding unethical Progressives who you know, as though that's evidence of anything. As a "critical thinking Progressive" that right there is a big red flag to me that you generally have no critical thinking skills. That's HOW education works. I'm "looking" for "evidence" of something you're trying to "prove." In that sense I've proven your point that I like to promote those skills... but your railing some awkward bon-mot about critical thinking also implies that you simply believe everything you hear and read. That is actually hilarious. Also, what "studies" are you citing that confirm people who are critical thinking have a "pessimistic outlook on life?" Are these studies done in your living room, asking your relatives to believe sticking a fork in their eye will "feel good," and then triumphantly declaring them "pessimists" when they're critical of your assertion? You are the golden goose to the uneducated bumper sticker collective. And I appreciate you, because you make it easier for me to get ahead in this truth-based world.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Steve ® June 10, 2013 at 03:55 pm
So? What was used and what harm does it cause? Although ironic this may provide more good thanRead More harm. What is written on the application sign?
Cricket June 11, 2013 at 01:31 pm
The bluff and other areas need to be planted with things that will snuff out the weeds. They areRead More harmful to animals and possibly birds, of which there are many at atwater. Obviously not many animals but there are squirrels and rabbits and other native mammals. Not to mention the kids at the play area. Most adult humans can handle an occasional wiff of a pesticide but not children or animals. I have held several pesticide licenses in my day so I have had much course work on this. I am surprised the village has done this but I know restoration is about to begin - again - on the bluff and perhaps they are trying to rid the bluff of all the weeds. It is a shame that the 15+ kids they hire every year can't be up there weeding instead. I don't know what else they could be doing as the village has reduced the amount of annual flower beds that need to be maintained.
PaulRevere June 10, 2013 at 12:40 pm
The liberal minded Patch had it going their way for some time. Then, the contrary opinions became aRead More "voice to be heard". So, like all liberal media, just shut down the "free speech". Speech that educates the people is a NO-NO in the world of "public education". Have no fear, other avenues to educate the public is on the way.
CowDung June 10, 2013 at 12:53 pm
Given the amount of liberal propaganda that is posted around here, one does have to wonder if PatchRead More intended to make it more difficult to reply to comments (and set the record straight)...
Mike Stevens June 14, 2013 at 07:20 am
Wow, PaulRevere, AKA the hardest working person in America, who only takes 1 day per month off andRead More who believes all evil is related to public schooling, has time to not only comment on St. Louis area Patch sites, but on Milwaukee area sites as well? Paul, perhaps you should go back to school to check your grammar--other avenues to educate the public ARE on the way, not IS on the way. Oh, you must be too busy working 20 hours a day (but finding tons of time to comment on several Patch sites) to check grammar
Walker celebrates after defeating the liberal unionista blue fisters
Steve ® June 6, 2013 at 12:10 pm
Sure Keith. I am sure every time you use the term Tea Bagger it is not vulgar. The symbol for yourRead More failed recall movement was a Blue Fist. No one wants to be ruled by a fist and I don't see how that is vulgar when your own logo was a blue fist. Try again.
Keith Schmitz June 6, 2013 at 01:03 pm
Are you assuming we're stupid Steve? Don't. BTW -- you called yourselves Tea Baggers. We're onlyRead More using the term you selected. What a great PR roll-up for this group of Neanderthals. You're problem with that any fister reference is usually the speaker feels it is where his head should be.
Greg June 6, 2013 at 01:10 pm
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH, that is why their fists are blue, OUCH!
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:04 am
I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change...
Bob McBride June 6, 2013 at 09:15 am
I got the name wrong, it was "Bellmore", not Belmont. It was part of rollout of what atRead More the time was being referred to as "Patch 2.0" in the press. It was rolled out to five towns in the Long Island, NY area in September of last year. I'm going to attempt to post a link to an article:: http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/189296/aols-redesigned-patch-websites-make-a-play-for-neighborhood-groups/
CowDung June 6, 2013 at 09:30 am
"I think if you look at most of the sites still running the older version, you'll see the sameRead More messages of impending doom we got just before the change... " | I think that's true, Bob. I poked around at a number of Patch sites around the country and the 'Welcome to the New Patch' articles were full of the same complaints we are seeing here. | This Patch redesign seems to be the 'New Coke' of websites...
Greg June 4, 2013 at 03:38 pm
Starting at ONLY $70,000.00 Time to cash in your aluminum cans.