patching...
Update: Have you signed up for our once-daily newsletter yet? Click here to get the top headlines right in your inbox! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

The Real Shorewood Icon

The most visible building in Shorewood is getting a facelift? And yes, we are paying for it! Come share your thoughts about the ramen-noodle, faux eyelash, playground equipment additions to one bank in Shorewood.

 

What is it? Are they done? Who is doing that? Is it a playground? Is it eyes? Is it the bank logo? What do you think it looks like? Tell us now!

Many have asked, and I have wondered myself, where is the North Shore Bank going with this playground equipment out front?

So, I did a little digging and it turns out this facade improvement was approved by the Village of Shorewood and the Community Development Authority last February. 

Not only that, but the building's owner was approved for one of those elusive "facade" grants to put it up.

It just seems ironic, that here something very significant to the aesthetic and visibility of the village was able to pop past the CDA and pass the Facade Improvement Grant test... while simultaneously, a careful, painstaking, visual and expert decision about a certain world-famous Plensa sculpture was taking place. Precautions and planning and inviting the artist here from Barcelona to plot the base and height for safety and visual impact took place over a year (and, by the way, the sculpture, base, lighting and plantings were generous donations to the village), and still incurred much public discussion about the impact on the village. To the contrary, the bank addition did not, because perhaps it is not billed at "public art?" The bank building thing, what do we do with it? Could we borrow it to make a fence at Atwater Beach?

All joking aside, these additions look rather sturdy to me and ready for play. I have already had to keep at least one kid off of it, as it looks like playground equipment. It is at ground level, with the first rung within reach. What is to keep anyone from taking a noon-time climb? Seems inviting enough. They are accessible by design to passers-by. They look, in the renderings, to be purposely interactive. This "facade" on the North Shore Bank (colloquially the Badger Bank) building went to one committee meeting (according to public record). There was/is no public outcry, no rampant viral emails about the base or direction it is facing. This "work" will be funded by Shorewood, and will speak more for the village's aesthetics than any other structure because of its placement and visibility. Where is the shock and awe best directed? To the village — let's find out what this is costing taxpayers. It's a bank. Do they really need our sewer-liner- and Atwater bluff-strapped-taxpayers to pay for their curiosity that didn't have to pass any vote or referendum?

The building's location on the main intersection of Shorewood has long made it a beacon and the signature to Shorewood. I remember when it had a flashing clock and temperature (or was it time and date?) on the top that you could read from the bridge at Capitol Drive and Wilson Bouelvard. Plus, who could forget that it was the only Tyme (ATM) machine in the village, with people popping in and out of there like popcorn? It was like the village center, the building you grew up trusting.

So let's watch and learn, as more of Shorewood becomes a jungle... gym, and wonder, in our minds, what message it sends about Shorewood.

And yes, we’re paying for that.

For the details look at the archives on the Village of Shorewood's website.

"Community Development Authority Approves Facade Grant for North Shore Bank Building. On Friday, February 5, 2010, the Village's Community Development Authority recommended approving a facade improvement grant for the North Shore Bank Building at the corner of Oakland Avenue and Capitol Drive.  Architects drawings 1,2,3."

What do you think it looks like? Tell us now!

About this column: Jenny Steinman Heyden grew up in Shorewood, went to Oberlin, had a busy art and marketing career in Chicago, and has returned to raise her family and support the community.
What are your thoughts on the new North Shore Bank art? Tell us in the comments.

Nancy Bamberg

1:50 pm on Sunday, January 23, 2011

What a ridiculous waste of money. The idiots on the committee should be run out of town. We need so many other crucial things. This is another example of Shorewood trying to be trendy.

Reply

Desty Lorino

8:16 am on Monday, January 24, 2011

When I saw the rendering I thought that's all it was? We're all at fault we all should have paid closer attention if we didn't like it. Saying nothing was the same as giving permission. I was surprised to see it was really going to happen!

Reply

Bill Trost

10:25 am on Monday, January 24, 2011

North Shore Bank has the distinction of having the two ugliest buildings in Shorewood.

Reply

Jenny Heyden

11:08 am on Monday, January 24, 2011

Does the CDA make public building facades they are considering? I don't think so, but maybe I missed the notice somewhere? I suppose one could start attending CDA meetings as a villager. Are there required aesthetic considerations that we can review? Just wondering. And is that facade grant still available for residents of Shorewood? More questions..sorry.

Reply

David Tatarowicz

12:46 pm on Monday, January 24, 2011

The Design Review Board Approved the design at their Jan 28, 2010 meeting --- this is from the minutes of that meeting

3. Consideration of facade improvement design for North Shore Bank building located at commercial property 3970 N. Oakland Avenue, property owned by JJ & R Enterprises. Architect Scott Kindness presented the design of the façade improvements. Building owner Geraldine Robinson was also present and other related professionals working on the project.
Mr. Kindness explained the new window shelves, and the vertical and horizontal metal ribbons on the north and west facades. Members discussed materials, maintenance and design. Mr. Carnahan and Mr. Omon shared concern of the design being too whimsical for such a substantial precast building. All discussed metal designs at ground level for safety and weather relief.
Mr. Kupczak moved to approve, seconded by Mr. Linnane. Vote carried 4-3. Votes in favor were M. Skauge, P. Linnane, W. Kohl, D. Kupczak. Nay votes were N. Carnahan, A. Weninger and C. Omon.

Reply

David Tatarowicz

12:51 pm on Monday, January 24, 2011

I find it amazing that the facade for the bank flew through the process so quickly. I have attended Design Review Board sessions in which they have grilled small business owners over their signage, and made them come back with different designs ........... The Brit Inn barely got approval for their sign, as members thought it was too big!

Reply

Anne

9:42 pm on Sunday, January 30, 2011

I can't wait for the Wisteria to be in bloom! It will look lovely hanging from the jungle gym!

Reply

Leave a comment