patching...
Update: Have you signed up for our once-daily newsletter yet? Click here to get the top headlines right in your inbox! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

State Mining Bill Push Begins with Public Hearing

Backers and opponents of mining legislation filled a more than 100-seat hearing room and two overflow rooms in the Capitol to be heard on the prospect of a mine in the state.

 

Last March, one Republican lawmaker held up passage of a GOP-backed bill that would have paved the way for construction of an iron ore mine in northern Wisconsin

With a majority in the state Assembly and Senate this legislative session, GOP lawmakers labeled mining legislation a top priority and began their push with an all-day public hearing Wednesday.

Backers and opponents of the mining legislation filled a more than 100-seat hearing room in the Capitol and two overflow rooms to be heard on the prospect of a mine in the state, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.

Those backing the legislation say it would bring jobs to a local economy that currently doesn’t offer many opportunities, while the opposing faction says the bill would weaken environmental protections, in particular for wetlands, groundwater and surface water, the newspaper writes.

And, while GOP lawmakers are still pushing mining regulation reform — introducing essentially the same bill last week — state Sen. Tim Cullen, a Democrat from Janesville, countered Tuesday with his own piece of legislation. Cullen says the bill would “uphold Wisconsin’s environmental requirements while also providing certainty to the mining industry.”

“Democrats and Republicans alike heard the same recommendations from mining experts that I did, and I stand by this bill as a realistic solution to the mining industry’s request for certainty,” Cullen said in a statement Tuesday.

Democratic Leader Chris Larson hailed the bill as an important first step toward bipartisanship in the Senate. Republican lawmakers told reporters on Wednesday they would meet with the sponsors of the alternative bill and perhaps pull from it for the original legislation, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. 

Democrats are calling for more hearings, especially in the northern portion of the state, but Republicans say Wednesday’s will be the only one. Democrats also took issue with time limits imposed on questioning. 

Related Topics: Legislature, Mining in Wisconsin, Politics, and Wisconsin Politics

Steve ®

10:59 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Drill holes.

Typical uninformed enviro idiot that gets the media's attention ►weaken environmental protections, in particular for wetlands, groundwater and surface water◄

We first need deadlines on the environmental studies. Like a time table, currently we have an unlimited timetable, thus no mining in this state.

I guarantee you the enviro weenie that made that comment enjoys products who's resources were mined out of the earth on a daily basis.

Let's get to work, we need the thousands of jobs and the economy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dirk Gutzmiller

1:47 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Steve ®
Your crude comments are inciteful. It spurs those that worry about the well-being of this tiny planet we all live on to greater action to preserve what is left. You talk like you are a mining nut living on Mars and have no interest in Earth.
You should run for a public office and make that "thousands of jobs" promise, so we can check you out and your "facts" publicly and track your hollow promises with the Steve-o-Meter.
You are trying to "catfish" gullible, low-information rubes into believing your malarky about plenty of wonderful, high paying mining-related jobs just waiting for the legislation, being held up by your "uninformed enviro weenie idiots".

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

2:04 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

As usual, no substance Dirk. When you can't debate the subject, you resort to personally attack the one schooling you.

Comment_arrow

Born Free

5:27 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

@Steve:
I had the chance to talk to quite a few northern locals when I went north during deer hunting last year and not a one of them had a good thing to say about the Democrats killing the mining bill. In other words they were pee'd off. They need jobs in general even the mining jobs.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

12:08 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Yes they do. Their average income is $25,000. They are starving while a blue fisting democrat votes, without any education, they can not have a job. It's sad. Hope you had a good hunt.

Comment_arrow

Bottom Line

11:13 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Tiny planet ??? ... Preserve what is left ??? Talk about gullible low-information rubes ... you, sir, should stop accepting every liberal rant and do some homework.

There are abundant resources, and industry has done a marvelous job of incorporating respectful profitable operation with community building. The obvious benefit to inviting industry to our state is the opportunity for utilizing our resources, rather than buying from others - creating job opportunities, instead of handing out unemployment checks - establishing successful private industry, instead of demanding someone else pay our bills.

I'm sure you can find a examples that weren't appropriately implemented, but the vast majority of industry has improved, and continues to be the life blood of the future.

The stonewalling that Steve has consistently pointed out is a problem that needs to be arrested. The fact that we have government bodies that can simply "table", or endlessly delay resolution (see the US Senate as the worst offenders) for future opportunity is a path to austerity.

WaitingForTheSpark

11:16 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

It is common knowledge that the work ethic of the northern Wisconsin Native American male has declined through the decades. Bad attitudes, alcohol and drug abuse contribute to a bad work ethic and ultimately subpar productivity. I hope when the mine finally gets approval the owners don’t hire any Native Americans from the area. These people fought against the mine they should not get a job there when it’s built. The Mexicans will flood to northern Wisconsin like bees to honey once the mine is operational.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Richard Head

6:42 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

The Mexicans have already flooded Northern Wisconsin. They work on the Dairy Farms there - the Farmers prefer them over the local whites. They have their families and live in trailers - remember that Dairy farming is a 7 day a week occupation, It has special, low agricultural wage rates, and there is no overtime pay.

I spent some time working on a Dairy Farm close to Fairchild, WI. Rough work - mostly manual. Your regular government slug couldn't handle it. In a small town, in the middle of nowhere was an ethnic Mexican store - for the Mexican laborers that work on the Farms. Lots of illegals, and unlicensed drivers. They work the Dairy Farms of Wisconsin.

Comment_arrow

Dominic Joseph Radanovich

2:08 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

You seem to forget that the Native Americans were here first and are still here. This is their land that you are talking about. Born here or not, you are an immigrant and a foreigner. You are also a bigot!

Comment_arrow

Bottom Line

11:19 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Dominic ... they immigrated here as well, check your history.

The current generations should respect where they are, instead of wasting emotion on century old history. As far as reprehensible ancestors ... they can be found in every culture - world wide - ... why restrict your angst in one small area, with one small group?

morninmist

11:26 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Very good article:

Geologist Tom Fitz details the composition of the “Tyler Formation;” the large, wedge-shaped layer above the “Iron-Formation” layer (see figure, above).

There is also pyrite present in the Tyler Formation, some of which would end up in the tailings as well. When pulverized and put in contact with oxygen and water at the Earth’s surface, pyrite and other sulfide minerals can undergo chemical reactions that create sulfuric acid. This acid can leach harmful metals and compounds that end up in groundwater and surface water.

It is also possible that sulfate ions released during the weathering of pyrite would affect the growth of wild rice and other elements of the sensitive ecosystem found downstream from the mine.

The legislation passed in January 2012 by the Wisconsin State Assembly would have decreased the rigor required in scientific studies regarding potential impacts, making assessment of potential damages difficult. At the same time it would weaken many environmental regulations that protect the Bad River and its tributaries from significant water quality changes.
THAT is the hidden danger in the current Mining Bill. ....

@SpudLovr The hidden danger in the Mining Bill version 2013...sulfides #wimine #wipolitics #wiunion #GovWalker wp.me/p1r8ol-EY via @bdgrdemocracy

Reply
Comment_arrow

CowDung

11:34 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Is he the joker that wore the 'Recall Walker' T-Shirt to testify before the Senate during the last mining bill debate?

Comment_arrow

Brian Dey

11:39 am on Thursday, January 24, 2013

The environmental impact is simple morninmist. You dig a hole, get what ou want, then fill it back in. Has happened all throughout history. You libs are really the bright ones, I see. #wiunions#suck#walkerwinsagain

Comment_arrow

Dirk Gutzmiller

1:56 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Steve - The Tea Party tracks the names and addresses of Walker recall signers, but scream like banshees when gun owners are tracked by a newspaper.
It's a crazy, upside down, hypocritical world you live in.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

2:06 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

What newspaper printed all the recall signatures with addresses? Please post a link

Comment_arrow

Dirk Gutzmiller

2:07 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

@Brian Dey - Your extremely simple view of mining as digging a hole and filling it back in is only surprising because you claim to know a lot about children's education. Complex processes like mining are one reason we educate people in math and the sciences, and hope they also have common sense.
.

Comment_arrow

Dirk Gutzmiller

2:22 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

@Steve - No need for a newspaper to print a list or map of Walker Recall signers. It has been on the Internet. Some people have strange passtimes, keying all that in, and a lot of free time.
Now, about whether my crazy, alcoholic next door neighbor has an arsenal of assault rifles and an ammo depot in his house, well, that's not anywhere accessible, that's PRIVATE INFORMATION!.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

2:28 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

As it should be private info, and is once again in Westchester, County, New York.

Please link the news paper article that published all the names and addresses of the recall signatures or retract your statement about hypocritical worlds.

and this has to do with mining how?....

Comment_arrow

Craig

2:30 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Still on the guns are bad bandwagon Dirk?

• A 1997 high school shooting in Pearl , Miss. ,
was halted by the school's vice principal
after he retrieved the Colt .45 he kept in his truck.
http://www.davekopel.com/2a/othwr/principal&gun.htm
• A 1998 middle school shooting ended
when a man living next door heard gunfire
and apprehended the shooter with his shotgun.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parker_Middle_School_dance_shooting

• A 2002 terrorist attack at an Israeli school
was quickly stopped by an armed teacher
and a school guard.
http://www.knowledgerush.com/kr/encyclopedia/Terrorist_attacks_against_Israelis_in_2002/

• A 2002 law school shooting in Grundy , Va. ,
came to an abrupt conclusion when students
carrying firearms confronted the shooter.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appalachian_School_of_Law_shooting

• A 2007 mall shooting in Ogden , Utah , ended
when an armed off-duty police officer intervened.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_Square_shooting

• A 2009 workplace shooting in Houston , Texas ,
was halted by two coworkers who carried concealed handguns.

• A 2012 church shooting in Aurora , Colo. ,
was stopped by a member of the congregation
carrying a gun.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/24/suspect-in-colo-church-sh_n_1450313.html
• At the recent mall shooting in Portland , Ore. ,
the gunman took his own life minutes
after being confronted by a shopper
carrying a concealed weapon.

Comment_arrow

Dirk Gutzmiller

2:54 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

@Steve - You are getting confused. I said that no newspaper printed the Walker Recall Petition signers list because it is already on the Internet. Newspapers, as you should know as you claim to be a big time "job creator" and all that, ha ha, are a business. They compete with the Internet, and they go out of business easily these days. Publishing hundreds of thousands of names would take a lot of expense and risk, and the people that would be interested in that section of the newspaper that day are obviously not the type that do much newspaper reading, and newspapers therefore do not cater to them..
And you do have a short attention span. YOU brought the link to the Walker Recall list into the blog in trying to demean Dr. Tom Fitz as a signer. To many, those signing earn a badge of courage and conviction, even as you sniggle and scoff anonymously.
...

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

5:58 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

@Brian Dey....There is much more involved than what you describe.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:49 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Lyle - please respond to the second photo posted. Thanks.

Greg

2:05 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

This legislation is for the entire state and input/hearings should be conducted with that in mind. This legislation is not for a mine, it's for any mine. NIMBY is going to be in play for any location.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bottom Line

11:22 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

I invite opportunities in my backyard, if that is where they exist. It means growth and revenue ... we could use it.

Bren

2:12 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Reading this article made me very happy and hopeful that this time around, things will be conducted in an open, forthright manner. Steve, the delay was due to the way things were handled. It's always better to take a little more time to things right the first time as we know; mistakes are costly in terms of time and treasure.

Morninmist, if that's the same study I read, it was made clear that this was a small-scale, independent analysis but what was found raised profound questions about soil content. The attempt to redefine standard geological terminology for the purpose of the original mining bill suggested a questionable attempt to work around those pesky soil content issues. I would like to see the State of Wisconsin invite in-state experts and also those from the University of Minnesota. I understand they have been extensively involved in the successful mining operations in that state. Let's follow best practices going forward!

Brian Dey, that's a bit simplistic. Check this out: http://rt.com/usa/news/fracking-earthquake-dallas-usa-610/

Not to get all science-theory here, but action/reaction is a reality. Also not saying that resources shouldn't be extracted but we really need to be doing this in an intelligent manner, not just going after profit like a pig rooting for truffles.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

2:23 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

They delay was due to the dems spiting Walker. The bill does not approve a mine, any mine. It changes why Wisconsin has zero taconite mines despite rich deposits.

Safe hydraulic fragmentation has nothing to do with a taconite mine.

Comment_arrow

Bren

2:58 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

No Steve, there were multiple constituencies raising concerns. As they should. After all, it's their backyard--and ours--that this is being proposed for. Have you considered that another reason for the dearth of taconite mines could be the soil content issue? Instead of blundering in and creating an environmental mess (and remember, Wisconsin isn't the mining company's "back yard), why not figure out how to get what's needed without environmental damage?

Concerning the Dallas fracking earthquake issue, I was responding to Brian Dey's "dig a hole, fill a hole" statement.

Comment_arrow

Greg

3:13 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

"without environmental damage" is kind of a problem. At some point you will have to accept environmental damage. There is environmental damage for nearly everything that we do, the question is how much and where it is acceptable. We are told to think globally until NIMBY comes up. How much "environmental damage" is there from a substance mined elsewhere and shipped here? The shipping alone may net more damage than the production here.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

3:32 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

The death of taconite mining in Wisconsin is because we do not have deadlines to the exploration holes, and environmental studies. In Minnesota they have a 2 year deadline, then a decision has to be made. This is what the current bill is trying to change. You can harp about the "soil" content for years when this bill passes and the studies begin. That is if inventors are even interested anymore.

The rock is the same as in Minnesota and Michigan. It's only miles away.

Drilling for natural gas couldn't be farther from taconite mining.

Comment_arrow

Bren

6:19 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

Greg, I don't disagree that environmental impact is a complex issue. Consider how South Korea's air quality is impacted by China: http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/news/regions/asia-pacific/south-korea/130117/south-korea-toxic-smog-china-has-increased-pol

The issue of the mine, in my view, had more to do with the need to understand what the actual situation is in the proposed region. The maneuvering to get the bill passed without a clear picture should have been a warning sign to any reasonable person.

Greg and Steve, remember that we did not lose thousands of jobs. The number of estimated permanent jobs was under 1,000 and there were no guarantees on paper (that I could find at least) that local workers were going to be recruited first for those jobs. The mining company's leadership (including adminstration and IT) team were all from out of state. It's quite likely that the temporary jobs could have been contracted to out-of-state companies and workers with equipment and expertise in hand.

Steve, yes, there is similar mineral composition across Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. But it is not identical.

As I've written before I'm not against mining. I am also for above-board, honest procedures. And I am also for language in the mining contract that ensures that a reasonable percentage of jobs provided are fulfilled by Wisconsin workers.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

12:15 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Yes basically identical, but the boogie man will always be in the closet.

You continue, and will continue failing to understand how a mine creates jobs OUTSIDE the mine. Thousands Bren. It's not rocket science.

Comment_arrow

Tansandy

6:50 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

"hopeful that this time around, things will be conducted in an open, forthright manner." Should we do this in a Rockford, IL. hotel?

Comment_arrow

GearHead

9:47 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Bren, where was your concern about beening open and forth-righty when the Democrats fled the state, the last Doyle budget was rammed through in the middle of the night without any hearing, and for that matter changing the Senate rules so ObamaCare couldn't be fillibustered? Not very forth-righty!

The Walker admin along with WI legislatiors continues to sell its vision of Wisconsin based on its merits, including mining. Only in your world are days of comment seen as not being open.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

10:46 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Bren:

What makes you think that the mine would recruit people from outside the state to fill the jobs that the mine creates? Is it really that advantageous for the mine to pay for moving expenses and such to bring in out of state workers if there are plenty of local people able and willing to do the work?

Secondly, even if they do bring in out of state people to fill all of the new jobs, isn't there still going to be an increase in economic activity (and more jobs created) as those workers join the local economy and start spending their paychecks at local businesses?

I think quotas that require an employer to hire 'x number' of a target demographic are generally a bad idea, particularly in the private sector.

Comment_arrow

morninmist

11:03 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Cow dung

Republicans did not like it when Pelosi said lets pass the bill and we will see what is in it.
Now the show is on the other foot. The mining company will let us know its plans after the bill is passed.

http://www.postcrescent.com/viewart/20130124/APC010401/301240285/State-GOP-begins-mining-bill-push-hearing-story-photos-

........Democrats on the committees peppered Seitz and Gogebic Taconite President Bill Williams with multiple what-if scenarios, asking whether the company is really committed to the project, whether it would hire Wisconsin workers when hundreds of experienced miners are out of work around the country and what the company would do if iron prices plummet and the mine is no longer viable.
Seitz promised work would begin as soon as Walker signs the bill. He promised to release thousands of pages detailing the company’s plans after the bill becomes law.
..........

46 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Bren:

What makes you think that the mine would recruit people from outside the state to fill the jobs that the mine creates?
...

Comment_arrow

CowDung

11:08 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Do you not understand the difference between what Pelosi said and what you are claiming that the mine is saying? We know exactly what it is the mining bill, we don't have to pass it to see what is in it.

Comment_arrow

Greg

4:49 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

This legislation is not for a mine, it's for any mine. These "what-if scenarios" are irrelevant. The specifics of any one mine should be ironed out during the application/approval process.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:44 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Greg gets it. Greg must like success. I approve Greg for a mine.

Born Free

11:55 am on Friday, February 1, 2013

A person would have had to be on life support back when the Dems killed the bill with their fear mongering to not know what the Dems were up to and that they were going to put their EPA back in the closet on this one (until they need them again) and flip on the issue. At this point they have less then 2 years to sell the people of this state a notion that they're pro mining pro jobs. Can they sell that notion though from Illinois?

Dems have just alienated over 70% of the U.S. population due to their vigilanti knee jerk anti 2nd Amendment theatrics. Yes, over 70% per cent of the population now equate the 2nd Amendment with the Constitution and realize the right to personal protection is not to be entrusted to a government that can take all rights away. It took Walker to pass the CCW law after years and years of Democrat opposition.

People are sick and tired of liberal poohlitical correction because it's high maintenance in every direction.

Reply

WPN1488

9:17 pm on Thursday, January 24, 2013

@Dirk Gutzmiller, your Walker recall signers tracking was weak. We have a national database on sex offenders because sex offenders committed a crime that got them registered as one. Convicts, particularly paroled ones, are registered and given a rap sheet because they are, or were, criminals, and it's a matter of public safety to know about their criminal acts and past, especially in cases of violence. Most gun owners are not criminals, just average people who happen to own a deadly weapon or two or a dozen. They haven't done anything wrong. There are more responsible, law-abiding gun owners than not. It strikes me as draconian to call for millions of law abiding people to land on a massive list for just owning a weapon.

Reply

Tansandy

6:58 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

I find it totally amazing that the liberals here against the mine, claim how little if any jobs will be created if it goes ahead. But these are the same mental midgets that claim we will get thousands of new jobs and people will spend millions of more dollars if we build a high speed rail from Milwaukee to Madison. I must be have missed something in math class.

Reply
Comment_arrow

morninmist

10:46 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

I am not against the mine. I and others want protections for the land and for our health. Simple as that.

.............

Tansandy

6:58 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

I find it totally amazing that the liberals here against the mine,

Lee

9:52 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

We are still the culture of "them vs. us". Will this ever end? I am so sick of bi-partisanship on all fronts. Nothing will EVER get done with these attitudes. I think everyone should LISTEN to the other side and not go into attack mode at the mere suggestion "their side" could possibly be wrong for what ever reason. This is how we show our children how to behave in society? My way or the highway. Shameful.

Reply

Bill Mack

11:27 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

These people don't want anything like a mine bill to pass under Walkers watch. They would rather people not have good paying jobs I guess? It will be just like the Keystone bill that Obama will never approve no matter how much evidence that the environment will not be damaged. Obama would rather have windmills to do the job. It is strictly politics ideology and good paying jobs go to hell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:30 am on Friday, January 25, 2013

Exactly. Obama's bluff is about to be called as Nebraska's gov. just approved a new route for the pipeline. One that does not go through what Obama said was his reason to deny all those jobs.

But I suspect he will continue his us vs them approach and keep us all unemployed.

Comment_arrow

Dominic Joseph Radanovich

2:22 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

On the Keystone issue: It is more than President Obama. The Dakota/Lakota/Nakota People have spoken with one voice: NOT ON OUR LAND! If Keystone gets passed the line will have to go completely around all reservations. So it's not just the President. The People have spoken, too. And this must be honoured.

Been there done that

1:35 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

As a former northern WI resident, I can only hope this mining bill goes through and ruins the land and property adjoining the mining area and rivers that will potentialy be harmed of all the rich Milwaukeeans and Chicagoans who have their palatial weekend estates to the point it is deemed worthless. Then maybe people will learn how shortsighted it is to strip the land for the sake of money when we are left with a wasteland.

Reply
Comment_arrow

SkinnyDude

6:31 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Wasteland? they dump raw sewage in lake michigan on a regular basis...give me a break. You are talking about a problem that doesnt exist over one that actually does.

Comment_arrow

morninmist

12:30 pm on Sunday, January 27, 2013

The TeaGOP is a the party of ruin!

..............
@mostawesomeblog

HOUSE GOP: 46 Abortion Bills, 113 Religion Bills, 73 Family

Dave Koven

2:32 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

Craig...Get rid of guns, and you get rid of all the drama you listed as happening around the world. Now, re-read your list of events without guns being present. I am a realist, however, so print a list of events where guns caused more problems than they solved. I'm sure you'd have a much longer list. Not all events end well just because someone was armed. Also, no one ever talks about the effects on the shooters when they kill someone. The police routinely have psychiatric interventions for the cop who has to kill someone. The army routinely deals with PTSD problems in returning servicemen. Some never get over their guilt. Some feel no guilt at all, and those guys would worry me a lot.

Reply

Dominic Joseph Radanovich

5:03 pm on Friday, January 25, 2013

To Steve: The word is conquered, not concurred. Tell a modern day Lakota that they've been "conquered" and you possibly could be in for a modern day scalping! We are not conquered. Wasichu's just want to believe the crap their government feeds them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Steve ®

1:40 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

A death threat, good job. The ingins apparently stand in the way of progress here. Maybe a casino will buy them some support.

Comment_arrow

Greg

8:57 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Bringing non-indian casinos to Wisconsin is a great idea. They would pay taxes and support many families. Casinos must be better than a mine, from some of the comments above, nothing could be worse. One call and Harrah's would be building the finest casino in the Midwest.

Comment_arrow

Steve ®

11:55 am on Saturday, January 26, 2013

Takes a lot of iron and other resources mined out of the earth to build a casino. We can't afford that environmental damage right now.

Dominic Joseph Radanovich

2:15 pm on Saturday, January 26, 2013

There is no death threat here. Don't be so paranoid! We are not "injuns" any more than you are a "n....." AND, Native Peoples do not stand in the way of progress. They just have a better outlook and concept of Creation and how to not spoil it. And, casinos aren't the answer either. (I know you mean the remark about casinos as an insult, but that's on you.) This is what we all need to do. It's called good stewardship. This is not our planet. We are only here for a little while and then we are recalled. So, in the little while that we are blest to be here why not be good to each other and to the planet? We are all human beings to begin with, so why not behave humanely?

Reply

Bottom Line

11:34 am on Sunday, January 27, 2013

Dominic ... you seem to overlook quite a bit of lamentable history while you stand on "your land" that is part of a "planet" that is "not ours".

We have as much right as any in the State to pursue opportunity ... protectionist activity simply delays opportunity, or ensures it occurs somewhere else.

Acting humanely would require respect for the endeavors of those that risk for reward, create opportunity for others, and do so in spite of the reprehensible attitudes of people that cannot acknowledge the benefits we have inherited as a result of their behavior.

Let's move forward, that our inheritors, of every culture, appreciate the efforts of our generation ... instead of our debt.

Reply

Leave a comment