patching...
Update: Have you signed up for our once-daily newsletter yet? Click here to get the top headlines right in your inbox! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

School Closure Needs to Occur

With resident enrollment down, the school district needs to save money by closing Shorewood Intermediate School.

 

Editor's Note: Adam Schwartz, a Shorewood resident and student at the high school, will weigh in weekly, on school issues.

As trends like fashion and music have come and gone over the past decade in the Shorewood School District, one has remained the same — the districts declining resident enrollment.

In fact, the district has had to cut teachers, meaning the remaining teachers have had to teach in front of the largest classes in the history of Shorewood, cut classes like Chinese language and take up referendum after referendum.

Since the 2000-01 school year, Shorewood's resident enrollment has dropped by 13 percent, from 1,857 students to 1,617, even though the district saw a small increase in resident student's last year. The district's overall enrollment has increased over the last four years, but resident enrollment is where it's at when it comes to funding.

This year, according to Mark Boehlke, director of business services, was just over $12,100 per student for a resident student, whereas an open enrollment or Chapter 660 student would bring the district a little more than $6,000 per student or about half.

This decline in resident enrollment has put a strain on the district's revenue limit, resulting in a lost of teachers and, in the past few years, there have been many discussions regarding closing one school in the district.

In the Grade Reorganization Committee, most of the proposals have included a closing of Shorewood Intermediate School, a school that has operating costs of over $1 million per year. With the budget crunch the district is facing, why keep such an expensive school open?

Critics of grade reorganization say by keeping seventh grade students in an elementary school for an additional year, and putting eighth grade students with high school students, it will hinder them emotionally for the rest of their lives. Others say high school students would bully younger students and seventh grade students need the freedom from their younger counterparts.

A lot of the people who describe these scenarios aren't even parents of students who attend Shorewood schools, or students themselves. In fact, they hardly know what goes on in the Shorewood district.

As a senior at Shorewood High, I've seen almost everything that has gone on in the district. I went to both elementary schools and the middle school. I will admit that I had a rough couple of years at SIS and a pretty terrible four years at Atwater. That wasn't because of the elder students or the younger ones. It was some of my peers.

What I've noticed, in regards to bullying the eighth graders, is actually not true — for Shorewood, at least. There are times when those students require coming to the high school. Instead of terrorizing the adolescents, the older students welcome them,  joke with them and make conversation with them. (Yes, there are some "big shots" that try to be funny, but you'd encounter that anywhere you go.)

One of these eighth grade students, who chose to remain anonymous agreed.

“As long as the eighth grade teachers are at SHS, and only teach the eighth graders, no high school students, then yes, SIS could be closed," she said.

She added that classes need to be chosen for the students, as well as the half-hour, on-campus lunch they have now. Seventh graders won't be hindered emotionally if they were to remain at their own elementary school since "they would have been there for the past six years," given the aforementioned set-up.

Another reorganization set-up would make one elementary school K4 through third grades, the other fourth through seventh. That set-up would be better than the one above.

Let's face it, the school district has low enrollment, which means less money, meaning more cuts, bigger class sizes and more referendums. Speaking with numerous teachers, they all agree that something needs to be done. A bigger student-to-teacher ratio is not the way to go. An eighth grade student even says that she'd be OK with attending school with a bunch of "scary, older high school students" now, and she wouldn't be affected for the rest of her life.

Why? They're not even all that scary.

About this column: Adam Schwartz is a Shorewood resident and student at the high school, and will weigh in weekly on school issues.
Should the district close a school? Tell us in the comments.

Bob McBride

4:43 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

Good column Adam!

One question I have: Back before there was an intermediate school in Shorewood (I'm guessing mid-70s and back) were the 7th and 8th grades taught at Lake Bluff and Atwater?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

7:47 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

I thought, but am not positive, that they were taught at the high school.

EmpthyCursed

7:06 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

I would hate to see SIS close.
Leaving The 7th graders at Lake bluff and Atwater is a WAY better idea than seperating schools. I really feel if you don't give the people a choice of schools for K4-6, the kids will be shipped else where.
In the past, as well as now, older siblings are expected to walk younger kids home. This is not going to happen if the schools seperate and reorganize. Right now SIS gets out at 3:08 and Lake Bluff gets out at 3:15. 7th& 8th graders have barely enough time to get to the elementary schools to get their sibs. Will there be an area where the little kids can stay until 3:30 so those kids have a chance to be picked up by their siblings? (NOT A PAID service)
Many parents work and count on the "big kids" to watch their siblings until mom and dad get home from work. Now that people will need to work 2 jobs to make ends meet, being home at 3:00 to pick up a K5 child when a 5th grader could easily walk with him home, I feel is a diservice to the district as well as working parents.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

7:48 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

There are supervisors to look after children on the playground after school as it is, if I'm not mistaken.

EmpthyCursed

7:07 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

But what about the buildings...
Will the district then fix all of the restrooms in the buildings to be the proper size and enough for the number of children? What about locker rooms? Will they need to build another track? What about the safety of the walkers? (Shorewood has MANY uncontrolled intersections, like Lawnwood and Woodburn for example) Will we hire more crossing guards? What about the music rooms? Does the DPI or State of Wisconsin require a specific number of squrare footage per student in a room?Where will that money come from? Did anyone try to ask alumni to help or explain to them whats going on?
Some parents I have spoken with would rather see their children attending St. Robert's as a choice student, or put in for open enrollment in another district, than to see their kids seperated.
We can't lose anymore kids.
Having a choice of schools in the district is important.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

7:49 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

They could just put the students at Atwater. It's a lot closer to the high school.
I haven't looked into that, but I'd be more than happy to talk to someone if you'd like.

EmpthyCursed

7:12 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

I also don't understand why numbers are low, if the current sixth grade class at Lake Bluff was so big this year they needed to hire another teacher. The incomming K4 class is also already much larger than expected ...I really think we need to open up enrollment and look at numbers......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

7:51 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

This year was weird. Resident enrollment increased by 24 from last year, but since about '95, it's been going down. TOTAL enrollment, meanwhile, has remained fairly constant.

Comment_arrow

nancy peske

8:18 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

I'm sure the number was higher than that--more than 100. You'd have to check with the school board. They couldn't take on any new open enrollment students because of the surge of residential students.

EmpthyCursed

8:44 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

Adam, there are no REAL paid afterschool supervisors. They are only there for the lunch hour. I believe the ones you see, are through Milestones which most parents can't afford. A Supervised 3:15-3:45 service might be a good suggestion when the transition takes place.
I also would like to know where all of the teachers are going to park? Will the district release some street parking? Or mark the street for proper parking?
Many of the SIS staff have gotten tickets for being 2.5 inches to close to drive ways because they have very few spaces to park their cars. I would hope the village would work with the schools by giving teachers on street passes or marking spots properly.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

9:29 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

Hm... Well, with the money that the district would save, they could hire some extra help.
Regarding parking, I think they would have the same number of students, at least at the elementary schools. There would be, perhaps, more at the high school, where there are tons of open spots. Students would have to stop parking in the lot. Also, some Chapter 660 students would have to be cut, leading to a bit higher taxes. This would, however, keep the average number of students down.
I think now, we'd just have to see what happens. I don't think anything will happen anytime soon, as the Board continues to postpone talks of grade reorganization by a year. (Will they postpone again next year with the passing of SB11?)

Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

10:55 pm on Sunday, March 20, 2011

Glad I could be of some assistance :-)

free shorewood

9:34 am on Monday, March 21, 2011

Adam: That may be one of the best articles I have read in Patch on the basis of providing facts to a story. Congratulations.

Reply

Jenny Heyden

10:22 am on Monday, March 21, 2011

Adam - you are getting good questions. Could you answer some of them with a more expert answer, like "We will ask XYZ this question and come back with an answer on cost, feasibility, etc." I know there is research on things like cost of supervised playground time - an answer like "I think so" really doesn't help the conversation as much (though I'm glad we're having it, it could be more informed).

Reply

Ryan Holifield

10:51 am on Monday, March 21, 2011

Adam - I appreciated your article too; nice job. I grew up in a different city at a different time. I went to a K-7 elementary school and an 8-12 high school, and I don't believe that the experience scarred me for life!

Here's what I think: it's just generally tough to be a 7th or 8th grader, regardless of what kind of school you attend. While I hate to see us closing schools, I'd much rather we take that step than cut teachers and programs.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

12:04 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

With this plan, however, teachers and programs would be cut. It seems like anything the Board does, employee cuts will have to be made. I agree with you, though. I'd much rather see a school closed than boat loads of good, quality teachers gone.

Patch_comments_icon

Adam W. McCoy

10:56 am on Monday, March 21, 2011

The School Board is expected to open up discussion on the issue of a school closure again, very soon. For a quick recap on the issue, read a story Patch ran a few months ago.

http://patch.com/A-cC48

Reply

N. Peske

3:15 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

This is definitely a subject for discussion--it's a big leap to make. Would doing K-7 mean that seventh grade would be like 5th and 6th in that the students have 3 teachers or one for each subject area? I can envision how you'd logistically split up the intermediate school teachers. By 7th grade, students really should have specialize in their topics, no?

Reply

Carol McWade

5:17 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

Prior to September 1970, 7th and 8th grade classes were held at SHS. I spent grades 7 through 12 at the high school campus, and we thought it was a fine arrangement. Jr. High Language Arts, Social Studies and homeroom were housed on the 2nd floor of the Administration Building (the Library was on the north side only, with a hallway running through it). Science, Math, Art, Applied Arts, Drama, Phy. Ed. were held in the same buildings as the rest of the students. Half the 7th and 8th graders had Lang. Arts/Social Studies in the morning, with the other subjects in the p.m. Then, we swapped classes for the afternoon. We never shared classes with the high schoolers, just passed them in the hall. We enjoyed being part of the high school activities.

Reply

EmpthyCursed

5:54 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

I have concerns with the 7/8 graders going to dances or late night activities with high schoolers. It does seem that with sexual predators on the rise, many parents would not feel comfortable letting their 8th grader go to a dance with a senior. There have been cases of older students “dating” younger students in the middle school and it becomes illegal as things progress, obviously. If you combine schools, you really need to lay out the “laws of the land” to older and younger students . You can separate them all you want in the halls and classes, but when it comes down to it, they will all see each other at school pep assemblies, dances and other school functions. If we move them in , we need to educate them SOONER than later. Times they are a changin'.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

6:35 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

Kati, not necessarily. Dances can be made high school only or middle school only, but if a high school student wanted to take a younger student to, say, prom, then they'd have to get a pass, approved by the administration. In my four years experience at the high school, it's extremely rare (and by that, I mean I can only think of like two cases) for anyone older than a sophomore to date anyone younger than a freshman. Even then, as things "progress," it's still illegal. But can we really stop students from "progressing"? I think that's a separate, parenting issue. Shorewood does a great job with sex ed. in sixth grade, even more so as a freshman. I agree it needs to be addressed, but like I said, that should weigh heavily on the parents.

Adam Schwartz

6:46 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

I just feel like I should clarify:

I only meant for a school closing to be a last ditch effort that should only occur once--and hopefully this shall never happen--resident enrollment is so low that SIS needs to be closed. (And hopefully, that won't occur until at least 5 to 10 years into the future. I can't foresee the future, so I have no idea what's in store for the District.) I don't think that point was made within the article.

Obviously, many things would have to be considered--like after-school supervision, like Kati pointed out. Once the School Board reopens discussions regarding grade reorganization, your concerns should be addressed to them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

N. Peske

11:14 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

There are many issues to discuss and I recall hearing at a School Board meeting that if you close SIS then reopen it as a school you have to undergo a more rigorous inspection than if it had been in continual use. Those repairs would have to be made before reopening and the amount could be considerable, hence the VERY slow decision. I think it's next to impossible to get all the facts into one small article when there is so much to be considered. I'm guessing you're planning to give us more details in future articles, yes?

Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

12:15 pm on Thursday, March 24, 2011

I'd be more than happy to sit down with somebody to answer those questions for you, if you'd like (which it's sounding like it is).
In my opinion, however, SIS should be taken out of the SSD system, sold, and that would be one less financial responsibility for taxpayers and the District. But again, this closing should only occur when there is absolutely no other choice.

Joe Peterlin

8:35 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

I see some folks have you backpedaling furiously, Adam. Sorry to see that you've lost your journalistic backbone and are now only a tool, a little finger puppet.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

10:49 pm on Monday, March 21, 2011

Joe, excuse me, I meant to put that in the article. I forgot that addition.

Joe Peterlin

6:43 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Adam: Your much too intelligent to have forgotten items that completely change the tone of the entire article. Somebody got to you.

Reply

Aaron Rich

8:01 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Adam, thanks for taking the time to give us your perspective on this subject. It was a good read and well written. One comment you made struck me though, and I hope you could elaborate on that a bit. It was about bullying and how you experienced that from your peers. Was it the bullying that primarily caused your 4 years at Atwater to be a terrible? What was your experience with, whether that be a councelor, teacher or principal, in addressing those issues - if any? I'll understand if you don't want to relive those days, but this issue is important to us as we have one in the school system now and another entering soon and have already seen signs of what you wrote about. Thanks :)

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

9:09 am on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Hi, Aaron. I'd be more than happy to discuss that with you. If you wouldn't mind, go to the top of the page and next to my name it says "Email the Author." Click on that and write in the message that you're Aaron. Thanks!

EmpthyCursed

8:09 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Thanks Adam. I am a parent of a in comming K4 and 4th grader at Lake Bluff. I'm also grad from lake bluff k4->12. I own a home in the village, and I am an educator :o). I never really put in my 2 cents and I have been feeling like I should. :o)
The idea of reorganization just makes me nervous.

Reply

Joe Peterlin

9:06 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Completely hilarious Katfish. Try some yoga or meditation and maybe you won't be so nervous.

Reply

EmpthyCursed

9:16 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

I'm good thanks.
I just would like to still have a job and see my co workers have jobs.
Its relaxing and rewarding enough just to love going to work everyday.......... which I REALLY do.
I will chill out eventually.

Reply

Nancy Bamberg

10:42 pm on Tuesday, March 22, 2011

I have heard talk about closing the "Tuna Can" for several years. I would hate to see that happen, but the plan offered--that of splitting the elementary schools is awful. Sending the seventh and eighth graders to the high school makes more sense. They already use the field, and some go to advanced classes. A seventh grader is closer to high school than to elementary school in many ways. Many districts have the 7-12 configuration and function smoothly. To move the 7th and 8th graders, you are moving only about 300 students. By splitting the elementary schools, Lake Bluff moves 300 kids and Atwater moves 300. That's 600 kids--smaller and younger, too. Aren't some of the children in NW Shorewood closer to a Whitefish Bay elementary school--maybe they could be choice students there! By the way, this wouldn't mean teacher cuts--we still would have the same number of students--but with one less building cost--we could hire more!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Adam Schwartz

8:43 am on Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Sending both the 7th and eighth grade students to the high school isn't plausible at this time. Right now, there isn't enough space to house more students than just the eighth grade class (and I think THAT'S even pushing it). The eighth graders are pretty much the only non-high schoolers who take classes at the high school. (I could be wrong, so please correct me.)
But yes, both classes use the field. That's why one of plans is to house the seventh graders at Atwater, where it's much closer to the high school.

Lyle Ruble

6:42 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Adam; well done article.
Under utilization of the school facilities is a costly problem. Couple that with high maintenance costs of older buildings and it is time to take a serious look at closing one of the facilities. In my opinion the SIS building is the only correct choice. Of the combinations that I have seen proposed, the high school should remain as it is. The mixing of students younger than freshmen is putting younger students at risk, unprepared for more mature students. I want to suggest that we combine 6th, 7th, and 8th grades into a single facility. Because of the busy street represented by Capital, Atwater would be my choice for the Intermediate school. K - 5 would attend Lake Bluff, a safer facility. I would propose selling the SIS property and put the funds into an investment account to be used later for upgrades to the remaining facilities.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Peterlin

8:55 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

I like your thinking here Lyle. Unfortunately the last that I heard, selling the SIS property wasn't even on the table. There's an option being floated to mothball the building, with the hope of re-opening it in the future. I personally find this idea absurd, as it retains much of the fixed costs with zero productivity. There was also some talk of opening a charter school at SIS.

The common thread here is a lot of egos, turf wars, special interests and a lack of acceptance of the aging demographic. The last I heard, we're still waiting for the local numbers from the 2010 census and that magic Shorewoodian average age of forty or more, that would supposedly trigger some decision-making.

I like your idea of selling the property and keeping the proceeds in an investment account to be used in future years for upgrades to the remaining facilities. My suggestion would be to go one step further and dedicate this account to only maintenance of the remaining facilities and with it begin to usher in a new era of accounting transparency for village property owners/taxpayers.

Honestly, a much broader population of our village, young, middle-aged and old, need to have a continuous connectivity to understanding where, how and why their tax dollars are being spent. We need a long-term school district plan that is realistically sustainable and driven by a much larger resident involvement, not the short-term management by crisis that the small, elite group has given us for decades.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

9:23 am on Thursday, March 24, 2011

Joe,
Agree, let's make sure the money doesn't go somewhere else.

nancy peske

8:20 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Now that the census numbers have been out for more than a week--or perhaps they only released some of the numbers--is there any word on the average age of Shorewoodians? That was supposed to determine whether SIS would be closed.

Reply

Leave a comment