patching...
Update: Have you signed up for our once-daily newsletter yet? Click here to get the top headlines right in your inbox! »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Obama's Speech on Libya Left Many Questions Unanswered

Congress, public deserve some more answers on the U.S.'s strategy.

 

Libya is a country in North Africa slightly larger than Alaska and the vast majority of it is desert. Nearly 90 percent of the roughly 6.6 million people living there reside in 10 percent of the country – mainly in coastal cities.  On March 19, President Obama commanded our military forces to help protect civilians in Libya from being brutally attacked by Moammar Gadhafi regime by issuing air strikes to help prepare a no-fly zone. 

Last week, President Obama finally addressed the nation about these actions. 

I offer my gratitude to our brave fighting forces who are protecting freedom.  However, I believe the men and women serving in Operation Odyssey Dawn, the American people and Congress deserve to know the threat, the mission’s clear objective and President Obama’s plan to achieve it through the use of our military.  The president’s speech did not provide such answers.   

Instead, the speech left us with greater concern and more questions. 

The president pledged in his speech that “the United States will do our part to help.” But what does that mean? What is our benchmark for leaving Libya? If Gadhafi is not defeated or does not step down, how long will U.S. troops remain? If other nations begin to disengage from the coalition, will we remain or will we disengage as well? And if the president wants to actively pursue Gadhafi being out of power “through non-military means,” how long will our military have a presence in Libya?  If we needed to step into this crisis, will we need to do the same in other countries, such as Syria?

The list of questions continues.

And while the president said that the U.S. would hand over the mission to NATO, let’s not forget the head of NATO is an American. The apple really isn’t falling too far from the tree. In my opinion, Congress deserved the respect of being conferred with much earlier, especially when such actions placed more troops in harm’s way and the cost of these actions is already more than $1 billion – all at a time when Washington is trying to cut spending and avoid a government shutdown.

Our nation has a long history of promoting individual freedom and we should be proud of that. But the American people deserve answers and to understand there is a game plan. Let’s hope Monday night’s speech was just a start, and the president will keep members of Congress and the American public informed all along the way.

About this column: U.S. Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner represents the 5th Congressional District, which includes most communities in Ozaukee, Milwaukee, Jefferson, Washington and Waukesha counties.
Do you think our mission in Libya needs to be clarified? Tell us in the comments.

Brad

5:52 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Did you mean...does our mission in "Libya" need to be clarified? I assume so. It's somewhat complicated I guess. Ideally, yes...any military actions goals/objectives should be clear before any action begins. However in this case, there may have well been quite a slaughter before congress and the President Obama could have come to an agreement on those objectives. So...was it realistic to wait?

And a question for you. Were you fully aware of President Bush's end-game objectives when you approved of our actions in Iraq? I doubt it. In fact I doubt there were any exit strategies. We've been making them up as we go along.

Must you be so transparently partisan? I'm afraid you must because that's politics these days. A whole lot of partisanship and very little leadership.

Brad
Wauwatosa

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Jim Price

12:39 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

One clarification: While Sen. Sensenbrenner's words are his own, and Patch does not edit his commentary for his opinion, no American ground troops have been committed to the conflict in Libya. In his reference asking "how long will U.S. troops remain?" we will assume that he is referring only to American pilots enforcing the no-fly zone, not to ground troops.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

6:28 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Jim,
Sensenbrenner is a Congressman not a Senator.

Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

6:28 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Jim,
Sensenbrenner is a Congressman not a Senator.

Brad

7:46 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

First and foremost...JS is a politician :)

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Mark Maley

8:00 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Tammy: At the top of each column, write above the headline is a label that says "Opinion."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lyle Ruble

8:28 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Unless I have missed something, I haven't seen a whole lot of opinions published that counters contributors such as Congressman Sensenbrenner. One suggestion on his byline would be to put his political affiliation to read: James Sensenbrenner (R) , Congressman Wisconsin 5th Congressional District. I am also curious why there are so few contributions from the ShorewoodPatch. I see much more coming from WhiteFishBayPatch. I almost get the impression that Shorewood has been written off as place of those crazy liberals.

Comment_arrow

CowDung

8:46 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Is it really that hard to figure out who Sensenbrenner is, and that this article reflects his opinion?

Comment_arrow

CowDung

8:58 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

It says "By U.S. Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner" right at the top, to the right of Snsenbrenner's picture--A little bit above the word "Opinion"...

Kelly

8:36 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

I agree with finally going in as a humanitarian effort, but in no way should we have troops on the ground there. Other countries need to keep stepping up to the plate on this one because we just can't afford this long term. It's someone else's turn. Our other 2 frivolous wars have cost us dearly in money and in lives and there hasn't been any real tangible gain for us. I get tired of hearing how much is spent on defense ( including a warplane that has never been used), while other important things get cut.

Reply

Joe

6:41 pm on Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Congressman Sensenbrenner, where was these questions when then president Bush took our troops into Iraq? How mush has that war cost us in terms of both brave American lives and dollars? Way too many of both. This opinon "article" is simply your same blustery partisan republican retoric and zero substance. You can support a Democrat because you're a republican, don't pretend to fein concern when your motives and record on the subject are quite clear.

Reply

Leave a comment